Vote casting: 'Legally Blonde,' etc.

July 22, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Broadway has a new lead actress for "Legally Blonde: The Musical," thanks to an MTV talent competition (see story here). London and Broadway have also cast talent for revivals of "Grease," "Joseph and the Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat," "The Sound of Music" and "Oliver" thanks to televised viewer-vote casting.

Clearly, this works as a marketing tool. But are such competitions of any value in actually finding talent? While I realize that the standard audition process for such shows can be grueling, I also think that pandering to audience whim is likely to lead to performances that fit a mold rather than create something new and interesting.

But apparently the producers of these shows aren't looking for interesting.

Your thoughts?

And, be honest, if there were a local, televised talent competetion to cast the lead in a production at American Cabaret Theatre or Beef & Boards, would that make you more likely to buy a ticket?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Correction: The Legally Blonde replacement selection wasn't a viewer-voting process. The rest, however, were.
  • I hate reality shows in general, so casting this way does nothing to make me want to go see the winners in anything on Broadway. I'd rather see real talent honed over years of practice than a couple of kids who got a lucky break.
  • I assume casting directors have talent and experience in hiring talented actors, and I would prefer that they be allowed to do their jobs if I'm going to be asked to pay for a regularly priced ticket at a professional theater.
  • I agree with Barbara. I can't stand reality tv. Anyone can see that the general public generally has no taste anyway. Ever see the nominees and winners for the People's Choice Awards? I would rather see real talent in a show not a popularity contest winner.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am so impressed that the smoking ban FAILED in Kokomo! I might just move to your Awesome city!

  2. way to much breweries being built in indianapolis. its going to be saturated market, if not already. when is enough, enough??

  3. This house is a reminder of Hamilton County history. Its position near the interstate is significant to remember what Hamilton County was before the SUPERBROKERs, Navients, commercial parks, sprawling vinyl villages, and acres of concrete retail showed up. What's truly Wasteful is not reusing a structure that could still be useful. History isn't confined to parks and books.

  4. To compare Connor Prairie or the Zoo to a random old house is a big ridiculous. If it were any where near the level of significance there wouldn't be a major funding gap. Put a big billboard on I-69 funded by the tourism board for people to come visit this old house, and I doubt there would be any takers, since other than age there is no significance whatsoever. Clearly the tax payers of Fishers don't have a significant interest in this project, so PLEASE DON'T USE OUR VALUABLE MONEY. Government money is finite and needs to be utilized for the most efficient and productive purposes. This is far from that.

  5. I only tried it 2x and didn't think much of it both times. With the new apts plus a couple other of new developments on Guilford, I am surprised it didn't get more business. Plus you have a couple of subdivisions across the street from it. I hope Upland can keep it going. Good beer and food plus a neat environment and outdoor seating.

ADVERTISEMENT