Cheering up the real estate crowd

September 30, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Imagine being asked to speak to a crowd hit by the biggest downturn in its industry in decades, and motivate them to get back out there and keep selling. Or try to sell.

Thatâ??s what Dan Lappin faces when he speaks tomorrow to the Hamilton County division of the Metropolitan Indianapolis Board of Realtors.

Lappin, a Fishers sales trainer, says heâ??s never spoken to a group in such dire straights.

Housing sales continue sliding in the Indianapolis area, MIBOR figures show. Even in affluent Hamilton County, both the number of houses sold and the median sale price in August tumbled 8 percent from a year earlier.

What does he plan to say?

For one, his speech will be about hard-headed reality.

Convince buyers theyâ??re getting great value and sales will follow, he says. That means putting extra effort into finding out what individual buyers want.

â??Make it about your prospect. Put your own needs aside,â?? Lappin says.

What do you think? Will his strategy put points on the board?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Realtors, builders, and any homeowner expecting to sell their home need to look closely at what buyers want in a home. Location, layout, quality, and amenities. People love the advanced systems my company installs but many builders are reluctant to install them in a spec home because they are pricy. Then they wonder why the house isn't selling! I expect to see a lot more renovation projects as people decide to update their existing homes rather than simply packing up and dumping an amenity-free home for a new home. Jobs in a region will also improve home demand and sales. Buy US!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Liberals do not understand that marriage is not about a law or a right ... it is a rite of religous faith. Liberals want "legal" recognition of their homosexual relationship ... which is OK by me ... but it will never be classified as a marriage because marriage is a relationship between a man and a woman. You can gain / obtain legal recognition / status ... but most people will not acknowledge that 2 people of the same sex are married. It's not really possible as long as marriage is defined as one man and one woman.

  2. That second phrase, "...nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens..." is the one. If you can't understand that you lack a fundamental understanding of the Constitution and I can't help you. You're blind with prejudice.

  3. Why do you conservatives always go to the marrying father/daughter, man/animal thing? And why should I keep my sexuality to myself? I see straights kissy facing in public all the time.

  4. I just read the XIV Amendment ... I read where no State shall deprive any person of life, liberty, or property ... nor make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunitites of citizens ... I didn't see anything in it regarding the re-definition of marriage.

  5. I worked for Community Health Network and the reason that senior leadership left is because they were not in agreement with the way the hospital was being ran, how employees were being treated, and most of all how the focus on patient care was nothing more than a poster to stand behind. Hiring these analyst to come out and tell people who have done the job for years that it is all being done wrong now...hint, hint, get rid of employees by calling it "restructuring" is a cheap and easy way out of taking ownership. Indiana is an "at-will" state, so there doesn't have to be a "reason" for dismissal of employment. I have seen former employees that went through this process lose their homes, cars, faith...it is very disturbing. The patient's as well have seen less than disireable care. It all comes full circle.

ADVERTISEMENT