IBJNews

City won't take back suspect properties sold by Land Bank

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The city of Indianapolis won't try to take back properties that were sold by its Indy Land Bank to suspect not-for-profits or to Naptown Housing Group LLC, in which former land bank director Reggie Walton is alleged to be a silent partner.

An internal review found that in 2012 and 2013, the land bank sold 20 properties to the Indiana Minority AIDS Coalition and another 20 to New Day Residential Development, each of which saw their executives, David Johnson and Randall Sargent, indicted along with Walton on May 21. Department of Metropolitan Development employee John Hawkins and Aaron Reed of Naptown Housing also face federal charges.

U.S. Attorney Joe Hogsett alleges that Walton accepted bribes and kickbacks for funneling properties to the not-for-profits and to Reed. The city's review found that Naptown Housing was in the chain of title on eight properties sold by the land bank in 2012. A report on the probe released publicly Friday morning didn't identify the properties but said the information would be provided to federal authorities.

"Throughout the internal review process, we have been contacted by citizens who now live in homes they have acquired and rehabilitated through the land banking process," the report states. "We do not contemplate taking any action to recover title to real estate from an innocent purchaser for value, regardless of alleged fraudulent activity by a predecessor or an agent of a predecessor in the chain of title."

Thirteen of the properties the AIDS coalition acquired over the last year were sold to victims of convicted real estate fraudster Sheila Amos, the Department of Metropolitan Development review found. At least one of those victims, Joseph Satterfield, has said he was in the process of buying the home he occupied from the AIDS coalition when Johnson was indicted. City officials said they couldn't intervene in that transaction.

Mayor Greg Ballard's internal review dates back to October, when events mentioned in the federal indictment are alleged to have begun.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Electronic Documentation...
    If any city officials need more documentation on this situation, just contact me.
  • Truth Hurst...
    Truth, man whatever. I know what I'm reading in the paperwork filled (this sale) with the city is proof of wrongdoing. NONE of this information is from me. No accusations, just hard facts. My info is from the actual official public paperwork. The emails are time/date stamped from Google and Yahoo servers——NSA also has this info ;-) What I'm posting is 100% true, so I have now worries posting this information. The people are putting down mulch and flowers at this land bank house right now?!? They are blatantly disregarding the stop order. Me posting is not having a bad effect, quite the opposite. Sorry if my comments are bothering you, but I'll keep posting, you can just ignore my comments. Indy Land Bank Details here: - http://goo.gl/htLES -
  • Laughable
    Mr. Moore, your complete ignorance of the situation is laughable. You obviously have no idea what you are talking about. You should really be careful about making accusations when you don't have all the facts. You are a joke and your constant comments on these articles is having the opposite effect that you desire.
    • Go Back to the Beginning...
      The city should take back suspect properties from those who got the properties unfairly. Innocent buyers who fixed up the homes should keep them. But the city REALLY needs to check. Some of these people were part of this...that's how they go the homes in the first place. Example... The city put a stop order on one Indy land bank house. But the criminals who bought it are STILL working on it. I have ALL the details (video) on this webpage (near the bottom). Indy Land Bank Details here: - http://goo.gl/htLES - I thought a "Stop Order" means for the work to stop. Am I missing something? The city needs to go back to when Carrie was running the Indy land bank. This (theft) started well before October, this was going on two+ years ago.

      Post a comment to this story

      COMMENTS POLICY
      We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
       
      You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
       
      Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
       
      No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
       
      We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
       

      Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

      Sponsored by
      ADVERTISEMENT

      facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
      Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
       
      Subscribe to IBJ
      1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

      2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

      3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

      4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

      5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

      ADVERTISEMENT