Colts ask fans to design team logo

March 26, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
coltslogoThe Indianapolis Colts are inviting fans to create a logo of a horse that is “unique, versatile and fun” for the team’s Design a Horse contest. The Colts will use the winning design as a secondary logo to complement existing logos. In addition, the Colts may use the winning logo on apparel and all other Indianapolis Colts marketing materials.

Colts officials will select five finalists, and their logos will be posted on Fans will vote through the team’s Web site for the winner. The grand prize includes two lower level season tickets for the inaugural season at Lucas Oil Stadium plus $1,000.

Colts officials said all designs submitted should incorporate “a youthful horse that is playful yet strong” and appealing to Indianapolis Colts fans.

The grand prize winner will be announced April 26 at the Colts annual Draft Day Party.  Further details of the Colts’ Draft Day Party will be announced soon. 

First face painting pictures posted at the Luke and now this. What do you think?
  • Sounds like the Colts want free graphic design services. If they were going to a professional firm for this it would likely cost thousands of dollars. While I understand them trying to save a buck, as a designer, I am offended at the devaluation of professional designers.

    What a minor league move.
  • How about a horse running away with my wallet?
  • This sounds like flat out good economics to me. Why would the Colts pay for a design when they can get it for free?
  • How about going Old School and resurrecting the Colt that was used on apparel in the mid-70's? It was a picture of a colt bucking and it had a helmet on that looked like it was barely hanging on by the chin strap.

    One of my siblings had a Colts sweatshirt (probably from Sears or Penney's) with that logo on it in 1975 or so. Since the retro thing is so big right now, that would make complete sense.
  • Fishersgal, I think you have a fantastic idea. Hopefully someone will enter that. While I understand the beef by professional graphic designers, etc. I think this idea (and other forwarded by the Colts) is pure genius. Get the fans to take ownership in the team. Participatory activities are a great way to make them feel part of things. It seems the Colts learned a thing or two from their former marketing honcho, Ray Compton.
  • Its not like this sort of thing hasn't been done before. For all the jaded professional designers who hate this idea, you are missing the big picture. The opportunity to be the designer of an NFL licensed logo. Good for the resume if you ask me.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. President Obama has referred to the ACA as "Obamacare" any number of times; one thing it is not, if you don't qualify for a subsidy, is "affordable".

  2. One important correction, Indiana does not have an ag-gag law, it was soundly defeated, or at least changed. It was stripped of everything to do with undercover pictures and video on farms. There is NO WAY on earth that ag gag laws will survive a constitutional challenge. None. Period. Also, the reason they are trying to keep you out, isn't so we don't show the blatant abuse like slamming pigs heads into the ground, it's show we don't show you the legal stuf... the anal electroctions, the cutting off of genitals without anesthesia, the tail docking, the cutting off of beaks, the baby male chicks getting thrown alive into a grinder, the deplorable conditions, downed animals, animals sitting in their own excrement, the throat slitting, the bolt guns. It is all deplorable behavior that doesn't belong in a civilized society. The meat, dairy and egg industries are running scared right now, which is why they are trying to pass these ridiculous laws. What a losing battle.

  3. Eating there years ago the food was decent, nothing to write home about. Weird thing was Javier tried to pass off the story the way he ended up in Indy was he took a bus he thought was going to Minneapolis. This seems to be the same story from the founder of Acapulco Joe's. Stopped going as I never really did trust him after that or the quality of what being served.

  4. Indianapolis...the city of cricket, chains, crime and call centers!

  5. "In real life, a farmer wants his livestock as happy and health as possible. Such treatment give the best financial return." I have to disagree. What's in the farmer's best interest is to raise as many animals as possible as quickly as possible as cheaply as possible. There is a reason grass-fed beef is more expensive than corn-fed beef: it costs more to raise. Since consumers often want more food for lower prices, the incentive is for farmers to maximize their production while minimizing their costs. Obviously, having very sick or dead animals does not help the farmer, however, so there is a line somewhere. Where that line is drawn is the question.