Column was OK, but tone wasn't

March 26, 2011
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Letters To The Editor

Mickey Maurer has achieved much in his career, but he should leave sarcastic humor to real comedians. Not everyone who disagrees with him is a hateful, bigoted “Hoosier neanderthal.” I am responding to his article, not because I disagree with him regarding proposals pending in the Legislature addressing gay marriage and illegal immigration. In fact, I agree with him on the substance, but strongly disagree with his tone.

Many like me have opposed gay marriage as a further affront to the institution of marriage. Maurer makes it seem that if one opposes gay marriage then one is a knuckle-dragging neanderthal.” I guess that would include our illustrious president as well.

Like many, I have changed my mind on this issue. I used to favor “civil unions” until it dawned on me: marriage, at least with regard to the state’s role in it, is a civil union. Having said that, many who oppose gay marriage don’t have a bigoted or hateful bone in their body. To equate them with “Nazis” is a bit much.

Regarding immigration legislation, my view has also changed. Many of us conservatives have railed, correctly, that government should stick to its rightful place, and when it steps in to do things it isn’t supposed to, bad things occur. For example, federal intrusion into education, other than to desegregate it, has failed. For me to argue that the feds should get out of education while the state of Indiana intrudes on enforcement of immigration laws is silly and inconsistent.

We simply need to elect serious people on the national level who will protect the borders. By the way, I presume Mr. Maurer locks his doors at night. Protecting our borders is nothing more than “locking our doors” on a national scale.

While I favor more legal immigrants to our country, I do believe our national government has the duty to protect our borders and the people have a right to have them protected.

 It is not bigoted to demand that we know who comes here, for what purpose and whether or not they have a criminal record. But it is also not our Legislature’s job to vote on a largely symbolic measure that will anger visitors and hurt our state while doing little to nothing to solve the problem of illegal immigration.

In short, I find myself disgusted with Mickey Maurer’s tone yet in agreement with his position on these two issues.


John L. Sorg


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. "bike lanes, specialized lighting, decorative signage, public art, grass medians, trees and rain gardens" These are all nice things to have, but can we freaking get the hundreds of potholes all over the city fixed first?!?!?!!?!?!

  2. When a criminal with multiple prior convictions serves five days of a one year sentence and later kills a police officer with a weapon illegally in his posession, residents of Boone County need to pay a tax to drive to work... PERFECT Progressive logic.. If, on the other hand, a fund were to be set up to build more prisons and hire more guards to keep the known criminals off the streets, I'd be the first to contribute.

  3. Not a word about how much the taxpayers will be ripped off on this deal. Crime spirals out of control and the the social problems that cause it go unheeded by an administration that does not give a rats behind about the welfare of our citizens. There is no money for police or plowing snow (remember last winter) or or or or, but spend on a sports complex, and the cash flows out of the taxpayers pockets. This city is SICK

  4. Sounds like a competitor just wanted to cause a problem. I would think as long as they are not "selling" the alcohol to the residents it is no different than if I serve wine to dinner guests. With all the violent crime happening I would think they should turn their attention to real criminals. Let these older residents enjoy what pleasures they can. Then again those boozed up residents may pose a danger to society.

  5. Where did the money go from the 2007 Income tax increase for public safety that the Mayor used to stir opposition and win the election and then failed to repeal (although he promised he would when he was running for election)? Where did the money go from the water utility sale? Where did the money go from the parking meter deal? Why does the money have all these funds for TIF deals and redevelopment of Mass avenue, and subsidy for luxury high rises, parking garages in Broad Ripple, and granola chain grocery stores but can not find the money to take care of public safety. Commuters shouldn't have to pay the tax of failed leadership in Marion County by leaders that commuters have no say in electing. Taxation without representation.