Stand-Ups on Screen

December 27, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
With “Mad TV” star Aries Spears performing this week at Morty’s Comedy Joint and Chris Rock coming to the Murat, I’m thinking about stand-up comics transitioning into movies.

Although he seems to have the talent to do so, Spears hasn’t broken out. And while Rock has had plenty of opportunities, he hasn’t quite gelled on screen.

It used to be that there was no assumption that stand-up comedy and film acting were transferable skills. I’m guessing you can’t name too many Milton Berle movies or Jack Benny flicks. Lenny Bruce and Mort Sahl didn’t make the jump. Even Rodney Dangerfield was decades into his stand-up career before he was featured in “Caddyshack” in 1980. 

On the other hand, Bob Hope, Woody Allen (until he stopped being funny) and the brilliant Albert Brooks managed to effectively extend their stage personas into film.

Others such as George Carlin have made efforts in that direction. It’s just that the results (“Bill and Ted’s Excellent Adventure” aside) haven’t been very impressive. Even the great Richard Pryor has a very short list of watchable non-concert films.

You could argue that that’s because those artists didn’t control their films in the way that Allen and Brooks have. Perhaps, but other actors who had the clout to have some say have still avoided the movies. Ellen DeGeneres and Ray Romano seem to have gotten the message very quickly (from “Mr. Right” and “Welcome to Moosewood,” respectively) that they should stick to animated voices. Jerry Seinfeld has wisely gone right to “Bee Movie.”  Since rising to stardom, Dave Chappelle has pretty much stayed away from the big screen, too.

So what does it take to make the jump? Who do you think hasn’t been giving a fair shake in movies? And who should stick to the stand-up stage?
Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Don't forget Andy Griffith, Bob Newhart, Jerry Lewis, and the great (Kennedy Center Honoree) Steve Martin. Griffith has performed in just about every medium imaginable, actually, though most people know him now almost exclusively for the Andy Griffith Show and Matlock. (Griffiths' Wikipedia entry says he was a monologist in his early career. Maybe the term stand-up comic hadn't been invented yet.)

    Why Tim Allen still has a film career, though, I don't know. I think he may have sold his soul to Disney.

    I think the comics that have done well on film have been those whose acts originally relied on the ability to create a character somewhat distinct from themselves. There's a level of acting already present there. In fact, I don't think Robin Williams actually has his own identity, which is perhaps why he's been arguably the most successful stand-up comic in the movies.

    On the flip side, some comics derive their humor from other sources than a projected persona, so they might not be the best candidates for character acting. It would be difficult to create a film around the incisive and hyperintelligent observations of a George Carlin; his humor is almost entirely verbal. There's no George Carlin character; there's just George Carlin. (I have no idea what the deal was with his tenure on the kiddie show SHINING TIME STATION.)

    I wonder why black comedians in particular seem to have had a tough time in the movies, even the most astoundingly successful ones? (Anyone remember LEONARD, PART SIX?) Eddie Murphy had a great run, up to about the year 2000 anyway, but have any other prominent black comics been consistently successful (commercially or otherwise) on the big screen for any similarly extended period? What's going on there?
  • Don't forget 1/2 of Cheech & Chong and Lily Tomlin.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT