Panel leans away from Common Core, despite higher costs

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A legislative committee studying controversial Common Core education standards is likely to recommend the state create its own curriculum rules and testing program despite higher costs, the group’s co-chairman said Tuesday.

But the study committee didn’t vote at its Tuesday meeting, which was scheduled to be the last for the group this year. Instead, Sen. Dennis Kruse, R-Auburn, said the committee is likely to have a fourth meeting to consider a formal recommendation.

“There’s some sympathy for Indiana standards and an Indiana test,” Kruse said after the meeting. “But how that would be put down in writing, we’re not sure. The challenge is to get the wording right with a recommendation that we could vote on.”

The committee adjourned Tuesday afternoon following more than three hours of testimony from parents, educators and others – some who supported and many who opposed Common Core, a set of K-12 school standards created by a group of state education officials and endorsed by President Barack Obama’s administration.

The committee also received a report from the Indiana Office of Management and Budget, which found the state would spend roughly $20 million more in the next couple years if it opts against Common Core and instead develops its own standards and assessments.

The study also found there’s little difference between the ongoing costs of testing under Common Core or the state’s own program.

“The OMB report leaves no room for debate: Common Core is the fiscally responsible choice for Hoosier taxpayers,” said Justin Ohlemiller, executive director of Stand for Children, a group pushing for the national standards.

But opponents said lawmakers need to consider more than just the cost of developing an independent assessment. Suzanne Sherby, a parent of four children in Indianapolis, told lawmakers that she’s worried about the way her kids are now learning math.

Critics have complained that Common Core’s math programs are based too much on conceptual thinking and not enough on knowing how to add, subtract, multiply and divide.

“My child only gets one shot at third grade. And he only has one chance to master the mathematics he will need to be successful in any higher-level endeavors,” Sherby said. “I sincerely hope you will take these costs – which are somewhat difficult to quantify in terms of dollars and cents – into account.”

The legislative committee’s work is part of a larger effort to determine whether Indiana should stick with Common Core, which it adopted in 2010 and has already implemented statewide in kindergarten and first grade.

Earlier this year, the Republican-controlled General Assembly voted to pause implementation of Common Core to conduct a multi-faceted study of the standards. That study includes work by the legislative committee, the education department, the State Board of Education and other officials.

Kruse said after the meeting that the costs outlined by the state budget officials aren’t a reason for Indiana not to develop its own standards and testing program.

“I would have anticipated that,” he said. “And actually the cost seems to be a reasonable amount of money.”


  • No Need to Waster $20 Million
    Eric - The common core standards came from a study group initiated by state governors. It did not originate with the Federal government. If you review the background behind the standards as well as their content you will find that they are intended to bring some consistency in what is taught across the various school systems and the standards are also intended to bring critical thinking skills into the classrooms to better prepare students for the future. Indiana politicians have politicized the standards because the Obama Administration also supports the standards. Indiana students already lag many other states as shown in SAT and ACT scores. Spending an unnecessary $20 million to produce something that is "Indiana grown" seems very wasteful to me.
  • Can't be too careful
    I find the concept of common core to be a little spooky, and I'm glad to see the states starting to take a closer look. Allowing some centralized bureaucracy to decide what all children nationwide will learn gives an awful lot of power to a few people. Can't hurt to have a second set of eyes evaluate the curriculum.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. It is nice and all that the developer grew up here and lives here, but do you think a company that builds and rehabs cottage-style homes has the chops to develop $150 Million of office, retail, and residential? I'm guessing they will quickly be over their skis and begging the city for even more help... This project should occur organically and be developed by those that can handle the size and scope of something like this as several other posters have mentioned.

  2. It amazes me how people with apparently zero knowledge of free markets or capitalism feel the need to read and post on a business journal website. Perhaps the Daily Worker would suit your interests better. It's definitely more sympathetic to your pro government theft views. It's too bad the Star is so awful as I'm sure you would find a much better home there.

  3. In other cities, expensive new construction projects are announced by real estate developers. In Carmel, they are announced by the local mayor. I am so, so glad I don't live in Carmel's taxbase--did you see that Carmel, a small Midwest suburb, has $500 million in debt?? That's unreal! The mayor thinks he's playing with Lego sets and Monopoly money here! Let these projects develop organically without government/taxpayer backing! Also, from a design standpoint, the whole town of Carmel looks comical. Grand, French-style buildings and promenades, sitting next to tire yards. Who do you guys think you are? Just my POV as a recent transplant to Indy.

  4. GeorgeP, you mention "necessities". Where in the announcement did it say anything about basic essentials like groceries? None of the plans and "vision" have basic essentials listed and nothing has been built. Traffic WILL be a nightmare. There is no east/west road capacity. GeorgeP, you also post on www.carmelchatter.com and your posts have repeatedly been proven wrong. You seem to have a fair amount of inside knowledge. Do you work on the third floor of Carmel City Hal?

  5. I don't know about the commuter buses...but it's a huge joke to see these IndyGo buses with just one or two passengers. Absolutely a disgusting waste of TAXPAYER money. Get some cojones and stop funding them. These (all of them) council members work for you. FIRE THEM!