IUPUI and IU business degrees

February 14, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The undergraduate business program at IUPUI used to let in just about anyone. At one point, only the bottom 10 percent of a high school graduating class was steered to Ivy Tech or elsewhere.

Got a business degree from IUPUI? It wasn't something to brag about.

As with many things at IUPUI, this is changing dramatically. For several years, the bar at the Indianapolis business school has been near 30 percent, and it probably will rise as Bloomington moves ahead with plans to elevate its own threshold above the existing 50 percent.

If you're a student, which program do you prefer? If you hire people, which do you like best?

ADVERTISEMENT
  • Being a student at the Kelley School in Bloomington, I would have to say that I prefer Bloomington. The professors here are really what make the school and it is just not the same experience in Indy. What Indy does provide that Bloomington can not is the proximity to many companies and organizations for internships, jobs, and ease for part-time professional students.

    Both are great schools that just offer different amenities.
  • Having been a student at Kelley in Bloomington but also took summer courses at IUPUI, I think that Bloomington is a much stronger program as a whole. I understand that Kelley's Bloomington program is created for full time students while Indianapolis is more for part-time students, but the difference is noticable in the coursework. When in Bloomington, the word going around was that if you were having a problem with a I-CORE pre-req, take it at IUPUI because its easier. While this may have been nothing more than a rumor, there was validity to the statement. The coursework at IUPUI was usually easier than that of Bloomington.

    The one benefit to Kelley Indianapolis is that it makes internships and part time work much easier beacuse of its proximity to many businesses. The Undergrad Career Services Office did a good job on summer internships, but it can't replace the accessibility of companies within walking distance.

    Ultimately, the mantra of One school, two campuses does hold true. The requirements aren't that different, but the standards are. However, both are good, solid programs and are worth recognition.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I am not by any means judging whether this is a good or bad project. It's pretty simple, the developers are not showing a hardship or need for this economic incentive. It is a vacant field, the easiest for development, and the developer already has the money to invest $26 million for construction. If they can afford that, they can afford to pay property taxes just like the rest of the residents do. As well, an average of $15/hour is an absolute joke in terms of economic development. Get in high paying jobs and maybe there's a different story. But that's the problem with this ask, it is speculative and users are just not known.

  2. Shouldn't this be a museum

  3. I don't have a problem with higher taxes, since it is obvious that our city is not adequately funded. And Ballard doesn't want to admit it, but he has increased taxes indirectly by 1) selling assets and spending the money, 2) letting now private entities increase user fees which were previously capped, 3) by spending reserves, and 4) by heavy dependence on TIFs. At the end, these are all indirect tax increases since someone will eventually have to pay for them. It's mathematics. You put property tax caps ("tax cut"), but you don't cut expenditures (justifiably so), so you increase taxes indirectly.

  4. Marijuana is the safest natural drug grown. Addiction is never physical. Marijuana health benefits are far more reaching then synthesized drugs. Abbott, Lilly, and the thousands of others create poisons and label them as medication. There is no current manufactured drug on the market that does not pose immediate and long term threat to the human anatomy. Certainly the potency of marijuana has increased by hybrids and growing techniques. However, Alcohol has been proven to destroy more families, relationships, cause more deaths and injuries in addition to the damage done to the body. Many confrontations such as domestic violence and other crimes can be attributed to alcohol. The criminal activities and injustices that surround marijuana exists because it is illegal in much of the world. If legalized throughout the world you would see a dramatic decrease in such activities and a savings to many countries for legal prosecutions, incarceration etc in regards to marijuana. It indeed can create wealth for the government by collecting taxes, creating jobs, etc.... I personally do not partake. I do hope it is legalized throughout the world.

  5. Build the resevoir. If built this will provide jobs and a reason to visit Anderson. The city needs to do something to differentiate itself from other cities in the area. Kudos to people with vision that are backing this project.

ADVERTISEMENT