Contrarians think it's new day for Lilly

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The trouble-free market approval obtained by Eli Lilly and Co. for a new underarm testosterone treatment brightened the company’s outlook—at least for one of the few optimistic analysts covering the company.

Bert Hazlett of New York-based BMO Capital Markets Corp. viewed the approval of Axiron as a sign of good things to come—especially since Indianapolis-based Lilly has been struggling to bring new products to market. It is working to replace the revenue that will be lost to generic competitors in the next four years as patents expire on a string of blockbuster drugs.

“The Axiron first-cycle approval is a positive for Lilly and should help address concerns around mid-decade patent expirations,” Hazlett wrote in a Nov. 24 note to investors. Hazlett predicts Axiron, which Lilly licensed in March from Australia-based Acrux, could bring the company more than $300 million by 2015.

That’s not nearly enough, by itself, to replace the more than $9 billion Lilly likely will lose as generic versions of Gemzar, Zyprexa, Cymbalta and Strattera hit the market in the United States and Europe. But Hazlett said the Axiron approval shows Lilly can do those deals, and he expects to see more of them in the future.

Lilly executives have promised as much.

Hazlett is one of only two of 22 Wall Street analysts covering Lilly who recommend that investors buy its shares. Unlike his peers, Hazlett believes that eventually Lilly’s pipeline of 68 experimental drugs will put products on the market.

In 2009 and 2010, Lilly had a string of experimental drugs fail in late stages of human testing. Axiron is only the third drug for which Lilly has won approval since 2004—and all three of those were developed by outside companies.

Still, Hazlett noted, Lilly’s shares trade for a marked discount to other pharmaceutical companies. Lilly shares have recently been hovering around $34 apiece, but Hazlett predicts they’ll rise to $43 in the next year.

A few contrarian investors have been making the same case recently, including Matt Koppenheffer, who writes about stocks at the Motley Fool website.

“The market seems to be anticipating that Eli Lilly will shrink around 6 percent per year for the next half-decade and then never grow again. Ever,” he wrote in a Nov. 26 article, in which he admits to already owning some Lilly shares.

“Yes,” he added, “the future is cloudy and there are significant risks ahead, but the market has priced Lilly's stock at a significant discount to much of the rest of the pharmaceutical industry. At the same time, the market's assumptions for Lilly's future seem pretty bleak, considering this is a company that more than quadrupled its sales between 1990 and 2009.”

Read Koppenheffer’s article here.


  • Drug Patents
    It seems to me that Lily's should buy a company that manufactures generic drugs. Then just before their patents run out, license the drug to their generic company. This way, they can establish the generic drug as the highest quality because Lily's has passed along everything and they will have a jump in the generic market. Of course, if all of the drug companies did this, then there would be severe competition in the market, and we, the consumers, as it should be in a free market economy, would get the full benefits,and the best drug companies would prevail.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ