IBJNews

Court: Celadon 'general counsel' lacks license, can't practice law

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

A top executive of Celadon Group Inc. can no longer represent himself as the Indianapolis-based trucking company’s attorney because of a glaring omission—he is not licensed to practice law in Indiana.

Kenneth L. Core, who used the title of "vice president of risk management and general counsel" in letters and electronic correspondence, is prohibited from practicing in the state until he obtains a law license, according to a March 12 Indiana Supreme Court order.

Core, who earned $191,584 in total compensation last year, is Celadon's fifth-highest-paid executive, according to the company’s most recent proxy statement. His formal title is vice president and secretary.

The Supreme Court order stems from an Oct. 22 filing from the state’s Disciplinary Commission alleging Core had engaged in the unauthorized practice of law.

Core agreed to a settlement, in which he is prohibited from “holding himself out as ‘counsel,’ ‘general counsel,’ or any other title suggesting his status as an attorney licensed in Indiana to provide legal advice and legal services … unless and until such time as he obtains a license to practice law in Indiana.”

He formerly practiced law in Iowa between 1975 and 1993. The state suspended his law license in 1993 for failing to pay its annual license fee and for failing to comply with its continuing legal education requirements, the Supreme Court order said.

Core admitted to the Disciplinary Commission that he is not licensed to practice in Indiana and provided evidence that Celadon was aware that he lacked the credentials to do so.
 
Paul Will, Celadon’s vice chairman and chief financial officer, referred to Core’s mistake as a “misunderstanding.”

“The resolution is that he just needs to get his CLE credits in Iowa so that he can get his Indiana [law] license,” he said. “It’s kind of a slap-on-the-wrist formality.”

Will further said an individual who had a dispute with the company pressed the issue and filed the complaint.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • re
    Marsha,

    I cannot believe you are worried about the Celadon pseudo counsel when you have a county prosecutor who appears to be on the take.Have you filed a complaint against him? That's the kind of guy who makes lawyers look bad.

    Get your priorities straight!
  • License
    Core's failure to know the rules for practice in Indiana is more than a "misunderstanding" It is arrogant and irresponsible. Companies around the country bring in General Counsel from other states. The first thing a new GC does is make sure he/she can practice in the state where they just relocated. Core, who according to the article, hasn't been responsible enough to maintain his legal license since 1993 doesn't deserve to call himself counsel, and definitely not general counsel. The actions of the Commission and the Court are appropriate. Celedon should start a search for a new GC.
  • Here are two lawyers who need jobs!
    Well, now that we all know Tim's source of funding has dried up he's going to need a job...and Carl, well, i don't know who would hire him but it sure looks like he needs a job too. They both have law licenses!
  • ha ha ha
    ha! you funny. a lawyer that "plays by the rules"? kma!
  • Rules are for others
    Its very common for large companies to have out of state general counsels come to Indiana and pretend they can practice law. I think this is a very proper ruling by the court.
  • Lawyer
    I have my Indiana license, and over 18 years of experience. Hire me, Celadon!
  • Unlicensed Lawyer
    It's hardly a formality when this guy apparently has not been licensed to practice law anywhere for more than 16 years. He's the kind of person who gives the rest of us - attorneys who play by the rules - a bad name.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. If I were a developer I would be looking at the Fountain Square and Fletcher Place neighborhoods instead of Broad Ripple. I would avoid the dysfunctional BRVA with all of their headaches. It's like deciding between a Blackberry or an iPhone 5s smartphone. BR is greatly in need of updates. It has become stale and outdated. Whereas Fountain Square, Fletcher Place and Mass Ave have become the "new" Broad Ripples. Every time I see people on the strip in BR on the weekend I want to ask them, "How is it you are not familiar with Fountain Square or Mass Ave? You have choices and you choose BR?" Long vacant storefronts like the old Scholar's Inn Bake House and ZA, both on prominent corners, hurt the village's image. Many business on the strip could use updated facades. Cigarette butt covered sidewalks and graffiti covered walls don't help either. The whole strip just looks like it needs to be power washed. I know there is more to the BRV than the 700-1100 blocks of Broad Ripple Ave, but that is what people see when they think of BR. It will always be a nice place live, but is quickly becoming a not-so-nice place to visit.

    2. I sure hope so and would gladly join a law suit against them. They flat out rob people and their little punk scam artist telephone losers actually enjoy it. I would love to run into one of them some day!!

    3. Biggest scam ever!! Took 307 out of my bank ac count. Never received a single call! They prey on new small business and flat out rob them! Do not sign up with these thieves. I filed a complaint with the ftc. I suggest doing the same ic they robbed you too.

    4. Woohoo! We're #200!!! Absolutely disgusting. Bring on the congestion. Indianapolis NEEDS it.

    5. So Westfield invested about $30M in developing Grand Park and attendance to date is good enough that local hotel can't meet the demand. Carmel invested $180M in the Palladium - which generates zero hotel demand for its casino acts. Which Mayor made the better decision?

    ADVERTISEMENT