IBJNews

Crean, Painter contracts packed with rewards for postseason success

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

’Tis the season for college basketball’s March Madness.

For fans, it’s time to don school colors and hope for a chance to dance.

For players, it’s a shot at one shining moment.

For coaches, it’s an opportunity to sweeten their annual pay—in some cases by more than $1 million in less than 30 days.

Indiana University hoops Coach Tom Crean has his eye on a deep tournament run for the first time in four years. And his incentives to lead the Hoosiers well into March go beyond the glory of old IU.

If IU makes it to this year’s Final Four in New Orleans as some have predicted, Crean will be due a $260,000 bonus. If Crean’s Hoosiers manage to win the national championship, he’ll collect a total of $510,000 in bonus money. That’s on top of his $600,000 annual base salary and another $1.64 million in marketing and promotional pay from the school.

Crean’s contract also carries a $125,000 bonus for winning the regular season Big Ten championship and $50,000 for winning the Big Ten’s postseason tournament, held in Indianapolis March 8-11.

These days, virtually every NCAA Division I football and basketball coach’s contract is peppered with such incentives. Some contracts are even heavier with bonuses than Crean’s, and colleges have found the most creative ways to boost their coaches’ pay.

Last year, for instance, Purdue University men’s basketball Coach Matt Painter was paid $50 per person when the school exceeded 11,000 in average home attendance. He got $60 a head for everyone over 12,000 and $80 for every person over 13,000.

Under that formula, Painter was paid $183,280 last season in attendance bonuses. He also received a $76,800 bonus for Purdue’s second-place finish in the conference regular season, $64,000 for being named Big Ten Coach of the Year, $32,000 for making the NCAA tournament, and another $32,000 for winning a first-round game. Painter left plenty of money on the table when his team lost in the second round.

“We believe in paying for performance,” said Purdue Athletic Director Morgan Burke. “Variable compensation isn’t new to the private sector, and we think it’s a good way to motivate people.”

After the season, Painter—who was recruited to coach at the University of Missouri—was given a hefty raise and his incentive package was restructured. Some of his bonuses were lessened as the up-front pay increased.

Andrew “Buddy” Baker, an Indianapolis attorney and Painter’s agent, said the bonus structure makes “perfect business sense.”

“Success on the court means financial success for the school,” said Baker, president of Exclusive Sports Group. “It only makes sense that the coach shares in the economic growth and success of the program he leads.”

Burke, who has been Purdue’s athletic director since 1993, said coaches’ bonuses have become more prevalent in recent years but have been around in some form for at least two decades.

The attendance bonuses, Baker said, are especially common at mid-major schools and college programs that are in the rebuilding process.

coaches factbox pay break-outNo bonuses for Knight, Keady

College coaches’ contracts haven’t always been riddled with bonuses. In the early careers of coaching icons such as IU’s Bob Knight and Purdue’s Gene Keady, team leaders worked for a flat fee on a year-to-year contract.

“Before the 1980s, a lot of coaches worked with a handshake deal and a smile,” said Richard Sheehan, a University of Notre Dame economist and author of several sports-business books. “In the 1980s and early 1990s, the contracts were two or three pages. They basically said, ‘Don’t violate NCAA rules and your compensation is X.’ Now, most contracts are 35 pages long.”

David Ridpath, a professor of sports administration at Ohio University and past president of The Drake Group, a not-for-profit that bills itself as a watchdog for academic integrity in big-time college sports, calls bonuses “a good way to hide a coach’s true pay level.”

Purdue’s Burke calls the bonuses “a good way to shape behavior.”

Painter’s contract—but not Crean’s—contains bonuses if players achieve a certain grade point average.

“We think it’s important for the coach to set the tone for the way we want our program to operate and we think attaching coach’s bonuses is one way to do that,” Burke said.

Baker, who represents a handful of Division I college coaches, said he’s been writing GPA-related bonuses into his clients’ contracts for more than a decade.

“These are student-athletes, and performance in the classroom is an important part of these deals,” Baker said. “His players’ work in the classroom has always been important to Matt.”

But paying the coach for athletes’ classroom performance can be a dangerous practice, Ridpath said.

“On the surface it looks … like a good way to hold the coach’s feet to the fire,” he said. “But I’ve seen cases where attaching a five- or six-figure bonus to players’ grades leads to even more academic shenanigans.”

For instance, Ridpath said coaches can make sure all their players sign up for classes taught by “favorable” professors. It also can lead to a practice called “academic clustering,” where all members of a team are herded into the same—often the perceived easiest—major at the school.

“You can end up having an athlete taking the classes the coach tells him to, not where his interests are,” Ridpath said. “These bonuses simply add another potential layer of academic fraud to the system.”

Crean’s big prize

IU Athletic Director Fred Glass said he has shied away from academic bonuses to avoid any perceived conflicts. But Ridpath said IU’s Crean may have an even more dangerous bonus in his lucrative contract.

The contract, which was crafted by Glass’ predecessor, Rick Greenspan, states that “for exemplary work, as determined by the sole discretion of the athletic director, in consultation with the university president,” IU can award Crean an unspecified bonus.

This year, the Crean-led Hoosiers have improved from last season’s 12-20 record and last-place finish in the Big Ten to a 24-7 regular-season record and a fifth-place conference finish. Some would call that exemplary work.

“We won’t look at anything like that until after the year concludes and we evaluate the entire season,” Glass said.

He hasn’t pondered what amount would be appropriate, but Glass indicated Crean could be in line for consideration of that bonus.

“My feeling was, if we qualified for even the NIT or the NCAA, that would be a substantial step forward,” Glass said. “We’ve certainly blown through all of that. We’re at least a year ahead of where I thought we’d be.”

Ridpath isn’t comforted that such a bonus would have to be approved by IU President Michael McRobbie.

“Some would say university presidents—and their endorsement of escalating salaries—have become a big part of the problem,” Ridpath said.

While Crean’s unspecified bonus is hardly common, it’s certainly not the strangest bonus ever written into a college coach’s contract. Some coaches, Ridpath said, have been given incentives just for not having any player drop out of school.

Ralph Friedgen, who coached the University of Maryland football team from 2000 to 2010, had a five-figure annual bonus in his contract if none of his players were arrested. One of football Coach Jim Tressel’s bonuses while at Ohio State University included the free use of a private jet for personal purposes.

Glass makes no apologies for including performance bonuses in his coaches’ contracts.

“It’s the market,” he said. “There’s a certain expectation that there are performance bonuses in these contracts. We think they’re a good retention tool, and certainly provide added motivation to strive for excellence.”•

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Bonuses
    Why not a $100,000 bonus for every player who graduates, and a $100,000 fine for those who do not graduate?

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT