Crean's staff has Sampson ties

April 2, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
CreanIf Indiana University officials sought a clean break from former men’s basketball coach Kelvin Sampson, their hire of Marquette’s Tom Crean failed to do so. Two of Crean’s four assistant coaches have a long history with Sampson. Now marketers wonder how IU will spin this.

Crean, who signed an eight-year $18.24 million deal to coach IU, was introduced as the school’s head coach at a press conference today.

By all accounts, Crean has assembled a top-flight assistant coaching staff that many observers expect will follow him to Indiana. Tim Buckley was the head coach at Ball State for six years, and Buzz Williams was the former head coach at New Orleans.

While assistants Bennie Seltzer and Jason Rabedeaux have impressive resumes, they also have some deep-rooted Sampson ties.

Rabedeaux, who was director of basketball operations under Crean at Marquette, was an assistant under Sampson from 1989 to 1999, first at Washington State and then at Oklahoma. After leaving Sampson’s side, he spent three years as the UTEP head coach. Rabedeaux has spent the last four years at Marquette.

Seltzer, one of Crean’s recruiting aces, was on the Oklahoma staff alongside Sampson for nine years, departing for Marquette when Sampson left for IU. That puts Seltzer at Oklahoma when Sampson first ran afoul of NCAA regulations. Seltzer also played under Sampson at Washington State.

“This couldn’t be stranger if you made it up,” said a marketer within IU.

Crean indicated at his introductory press conference today, that his current staff would be considered for IU jobs.

“In nine years at Marquette, this is as good a staff as I’ve ever had, and I’ve had some really good assistant coaches,” Crean said.

David Morton, president of Sunrise Sports Marketing Group, a local sports marketing consultancy, said IU must deal with this issue proactively, especially if Crean decides to bring his assistants with him to Bloomington as college coaches often do.

“Any affiliation these guys have with Kelvin Sampson will have to be addressed and addressed head-on,” said Morton, who formerly worked in sales and marketing for Indiana University Sports Properties. “I think Tom Crean and the university will be hyper sensitive about anything that could further dent the school’s armor at this point.”

Do you think Crean should be allowed to bring the former Sampson associates with him to IU?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I think this story is really reaching to try to find a negative angle. Most often the same assistants don't follow the coach. I think the premise of this whole article was really trying to intentionally find something to go against the conventional wisdom, which is that Tom Crean was an excellent hire.
  • your probably the idiot that was loving it when we didn't investigate the hiring of kelvin sampson more, i believe the basketball state of indiana is paranoid and must look into these stories. rich crean is an excellent coach so was kelvin, kelvin proved not to be an excellent hire and crean has proven nothing
  • If Obama can 'spin off' his pastor's comments as like having a bad uncle, I am sure the Sampson assistance can claim Kelvin is like a bad uncle.....I do not approve of everything he does but he is still my uncle

    Go Hoosiers
  • If I was IU I would want nothing to do with anyone relating to Sampson. I hope they did all their research on these guys.
  • As an IU alum, I've got to tell you this is a completely legit issue, and IU higher-ups better be ready to address it. Alums, especially money giving alums, want to know!
  • I don't think this angle is negative at all. Research would show that when coaches go from one big time job to another they typically do take at least part of their staff with them. For example, Roy Williams took his entire staff from Kansas to North Carolina. I think the Sampson connections need to be addressed but I also choose to look at the positive side. If these assistants aren't allowed to come to Bloomington, in my mind that opens up the opportunity on the bench (and remember, there are only three assistant spots on any D-1 bench) for Crean to put a guy with IU ties into one of those spots.
  • I think the question that needs to be asked is--has this issue been proactively addressed by IU leaders, Pres. McRobbie and the search committee in particular. If they let this issue slip by in their due dilligence process that says a lot. The second question is, will they mandate what assistants Crean can and can't bring to IU. Coaches usually don't like that kind of micro management. Or if given latitude on this, how he handles this will be a tell tale sign about Crean. This is a very big deal on a number of levels. As Sampson's assistants for nine or 10 years, you have to believe these two guys knew--and supported--what was going on in Sampson's program.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Apologies for the wall of text. I promise I had this nicely formatted in paragraphs in Notepad before pasting here.

  2. I believe that is incorrect Sir, the people's tax-dollars are NOT paying for the companies investment. Without the tax-break the company would be paying an ADDITIONAL $11.1 million in taxes ON TOP of their $22.5 Million investment (Building + IT), for a total of $33.6M or a 50% tax rate. Also, the article does not specify what the total taxes were BEFORE the break. Usually such a corporate tax-break is a 'discount' not a 100% wavier of tax obligations. For sake of example lets say the original taxes added up to $30M over 10 years. $12.5M, New Building $10.0M, IT infrastructure $30.0M, Total Taxes (Example Number) == $52.5M ININ's Cost - $1.8M /10 years, Tax Break (Building) - $0.75M /10 years, Tax Break (IT Infrastructure) - $8.6M /2 years, Tax Breaks (against Hiring Commitment: 430 new jobs /2 years) == 11.5M Possible tax breaks. ININ TOTAL COST: $41M Even if you assume a 100% break, change the '30.0M' to '11.5M' and you can see the Company will be paying a minimum of $22.5, out-of-pocket for their capital-investment - NOT the tax-payers. Also note, much of this money is being spent locally in Indiana and it is creating 430 jobs in your city. I admit I'm a little unclear which tax-breaks are allocated to exactly which expenses. Clearly this is all oversimplified but I think we have both made our points! :) Sorry for the long post.

  3. Clearly, there is a lack of a basic understanding of economics. It is not up to the company to decide what to pay its workers. If companies were able to decide how much to pay their workers then why wouldn't they pay everyone minimum wage? Why choose to pay $10 or $14 when they could pay $7? The answer is that companies DO NOT decide how much to pay workers. It is the market that dictates what a worker is worth and how much they should get paid. If Lowe's chooses to pay a call center worker $7 an hour it will not be able to hire anyone for the job, because all those people will work for someone else paying the market rate of $10-$14 an hour. This forces Lowes to pay its workers that much. Not because it wants to pay them that much out of the goodness of their heart, but because it has to pay them that much in order to stay competitive and attract good workers.

  4. GOOD DAY to you I am Mr Howell Henry, a Reputable, Legitimate & an accredited money Lender. I loan money out to individuals in need of financial assistance. Do you have a bad credit or are you in need of money to pay bills? i want to use this medium to inform you that i render reliable beneficiary assistance as I'll be glad to offer you a loan at 2% interest rate to reliable individuals. Services Rendered include: *Refinance *Home Improvement *Inventor Loans *Auto Loans *Debt Consolidation *Horse Loans *Line of Credit *Second Mortgage *Business Loans *Personal Loans *International Loans. Please write back if interested. Upon Response, you'll be mailed a Loan application form to fill. (No social security and no credit check, 100% Guaranteed!) I Look forward permitting me to be of service to you. You can contact me via e-mail howellhenryloanfirm@gmail.com Yours Sincerely MR Howell Henry(MD)

  5. It is sad to see these races not have a full attendance. The Indy Car races are so much more exciting than Nascar. It seems to me the commenters here are still a little upset with Tony George from a move he made 20 years ago. It was his decision to make, not yours. He lost his position over it. But I believe the problem in all pro sports is the escalating price of admission. In todays economy, people have to pay much more for food and gas. The average fan cannot attend many events anymore. It's gotten priced out of most peoples budgets.

ADVERTISEMENT