Critic axed by Cleveland Orch?

April 3, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The fascinating story of the battle between The Cleveland Plain Dealer, its high-profile music critic, and the Cleveland Symphony Orchestra has been a long-standing buzz topic in the arts world.

In short, critic consistantly writes negatively about maestro. Symphony pressures newspaper. Newspaper demotes critic.

The play by play is more complicated than that. You can--and, if you are remotely interested in arts and media, should--read the play by play in Cleveland Magazine's recent article here.

My question? What should happen when the pen of the critic for the paper of record consistantly draws blood from a top-dog arts organization?  Did the inevitable happen or was there another solution to the problem? And, ultimately, were the readers served?

Your thoughts?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Anyone else see the irony of a newspaper called the Plain Dealer firing a guy for speaking too plainly?

    Every major market newspaper has a sports writer on staff who regularly lambastes the home team, calls for the firing of coaches and players, and generally holds every game to superhuman standards. They attract bags of hate mail from readers and get badmouthed or brushed off by owners, coaches, and players as a matter of course. But they keep their jobs.

    Why? They sell newspapers. People may hate Bob Kravitz, but they buy the Star and read him just to get mad at him. They expect him to hold athletes' feet to the fire and make cranky comments.

    Meanwhile, arts reviewers merely add color to a section of the paper that fewer people read. Also, I'd argue that lots of arts audiences are inordinately generous to institutions like orchestras - when's the last time you went to an orchestra concert that DIDN'T get a standing ovation? - and many arts administrators think that critics owe them some kind of knee-jerk appreciation just because they're lovers of the arts and we're all in this together . . . or some such thing.

    I think perhaps the Plain Dealer missed a chance to play up the drama and maybe sell a few newspapers. The bottom line probably was that it wouldn't have made nearly as much difference as the sales generated by whatever crank sports writer they have on staff (and I guarantee they have one) - so they folded rather than backing their man.

    This is not a sports = bad/arts = good argument. On the contrary, I think maybe arts organizations and news media could learn a lesson from the relationship of the sports writers and sports teams. On one side, don't be so darned sensitive when someone doesn't like your work. On the other, stick to your guns and let the critic call it like s/he sees it.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. I could be wrong, but I don't think Butler views the new dorm as mere replacements for Schwitzer and or Ross.

  2. An increase of only 5% is awesome compared to what most consumers face or used to face before passage of the ACA. Imagine if the Medicaid program had been expanded to the 400k Hoosiers that would be eligible, the savings would have been substantial to the state and other policy holders. The GOP predictions of plan death spirals, astronomical premium hikes and shortages of care are all bunk. Hopefully voters are paying attention. The Affordable Care Act (a.k.a Obamacare), where fully implemented, has dramatically reduced the number of uninsured and helped contained the growth in healthcare costs.

  3. So much for competition lowering costs.

  4. As I understand the proposal, Keystone would take on the debt, not the city/CRC. So the $104K would not be used to service the $3.8M bond. Keystone would do that with its share.

  5. Adam C, if anything in Carmel is "packed in like sardines", you'll have to show me where you shop for groceries. Based on 2014 population estimates, Carmel has around 85,000 people spread across about 48 square miles, which puts its density at well below 1800 persons/sq mi, which is well below Indianapolis (already a very low-density city). Noblesville is minimally less dense than Carmel as well. The initiatives over the last few years have taken what was previously a provincial crossroads with no real identity beyond lack of poverty (and the predictably above-average school system) and turned it into a place with a discernible look, feel, and a center. Seriously, if you think Carmel is crowded, couldn't you opt to live in the remaining 95% of Indiana that still has an ultra-low density development pattern? Moreover, if you see Carmel as "over-saturated" have you ever been to Chicago--or just about any city outside of Indiana?

ADVERTISEMENT