Danica Patrick vs. Milka Duno

July 23, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
mdunoIf you haven’t seen the video of Saturday's altercation between Indy Racing League drivers Danica Patrick and Milka Duno, you can go to YouTube. More than 600,000 people have watched it since the dust-up in Ohio, where Duno threw a towel in Patrick’s face, not once, but twice. Patrick responded with a few choice words.

League officials have weighed in with a few stern words of their own. Both drivers have been warned about their conduct in seperate behind-closed-doors meetings.

The IRL’s Web site traffic, series officials said, has gone “way up” since the incident, which was featured on Bill O’Reilly’s Fox News show, Inside Edition, Good Morning America and myriad other TV and radio shows this week. Danica Patrick yesterday was the No. 1 search term on Yahoo, ahead of the likes of Michelle Wie, Heath Ledger and Miley Cyrus.

The IRL is once again basking in the glow of Danicamania. The fact that this latest incident involved another high-profile woman driver has sent this event into the upper stratosphere of media coverage. But is it all good?

“It’s a bit of a double-edge sword,” said IRL spokesman John Griffin. “Obviously any publicity and attention we get is good for the league. But I’m not sure this is the kind of activity we want to be known for.”

The rub began when Patrick accused Duno of getting in her way during Patrick’s qualification run. Yes, oddly, at Mid-Ohio other cars are on the track when drivers are trying to qualify. Those that saw the incident said Patrick was justified in her anger.

IRL officials are fearful the incident will fuel the notion that Patrick gets preferential treatment.

“In a lot of respects, what Danica did was appropriate,” Griffin said. “She parked her car, talked to her crew, and had something on her mind and went to talk to another driver about it.”

Two camps have evolved regarding Duno’s screaming and towel throwing response. One side said Patrick has no business approaching other drivers—as she’s done two other times—in their pit boxes. While the other camp said Duno was completely over the top.

With the often fiery Paul Tracy ready to take the track for the league’s race this weekend in Edmonton, who knows what’s next?

“This will be our sixth consecutive weekend of racing,” Griffin said. “And I think a lot of people are getting tired and testy.”
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Duno is a BIG B, and needs to get the h* out of racing.
  • Webster's Dictionary should consider adding Danica's photo next to the word, PETULANT. Her off track temper tantrums are not getting the IRL publicity it needs. Fact is, Danica's still a very average driver who rarely competes for the lead, yet drives one of the best prepared IRL cars. Milka Duno has no reason being in the IRL other than her Venezuelan-owned sponsor $$$s.
  • As one who was watching morning practice online, I can attest that Danica was not angry about driving that occurred during qualifying. Whatever the source for that information, it is incorrect. The blocking that occurred happened during a morning practice session, prior to qualifications.
  • Can you say Tempest in a Teapot? Not having seen the incident on the track that led to the visit, it looks to me to be much ado about nothing.
  • I don't know if this is what the IRL wants to be known for or not, but it makes good theater. Maybe this is a nice reversal from the vanilla personalities that have flavored this series the past decade or so.
  • Looked scripted to me. WWIRL.
  • I'd still rather see both of them wrestle in a tub of jello than on a race track. Danicant is average at best and Milk and Donuts is the female version of Marty Roth.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT