Indiana Gov. Mitch Daniels said Wednesday that he hopes legislators will send him a statewide smoking ban bill with a short
list of exemptions.
Daniels has been backing the effort to put legal limits on smoking in public places and businesses, but declined to say whether
he supported a push by some legislators to continue allowing smoking at bars.
"I'm willing to sign whatever bill the Legislature sends me," Daniels told reporters at the Statehouse. "I
think we probably should keep the exceptions as narrow as possible in the interest of employees."
A state Senate committee is expected to take action next week on a House-approved bill that gives bars an 18-month exemption
to the ban. That proposal would prohibit smoking in nearly all public places and businesses but still allow it at Indiana's
13 casinos, private clubs, retail tobacco stores, and cigar and hookah bars.
Daniels said he didn't want to rule anything out since he expected much give and take among legislators on the exemptions.
Anti-smoking advocates have said they will oppose efforts to extend the bar exemption past the September 2013 deadline currently
in the bill. Opposition from health advocates last year to a House-approved bill that included a bar exemption without an
end date contributed to its defeat in a Senate committee after its chairman argued the provision was needed to win Senate
passage.
Senate public policy committee Chairman Ron Alting, R-Lafayette, said last week he believed the current exemptions are needed
for the bill to get through the Legislature before this year's session ends by mid-March. He said adding other exemptions
— such as for nursing home residents — could be considered by the committee.
The Indiana House has approved statewide smoking limits six times in recent years, but the Senate has never voted on those
proposals.

















IBJ Conversations
10 Comments
Add Comment
I think they should definitely look into a spelling error/grammar error ban.
Hopefully within the next few years none of us will have to make any decisions. Our government can soon do all of the thinking for us. They can tell us where we can go and what we can, or can't, do when we get there.
But take the message and the fact that we are losing freedoms every day VERY SERIOUSLY!
P.S. I look forward to your english grade on this comment.
I have to wonder, why is it so important to you that there is NO WHERE for people to something that you disagree with... Even if you do not HAVE to ever go to that place???
Do you hate other people's freedom that much?????
These freedom loving representatives have my support and votes. We don't need a pseudo-parent government helping us make all of our decisions for us.
Please, if you are a non-smoker and do not want to go to a smoking bar, just go to one that caters to non-smokers.
Why do you have to insist on infringing on the rights of those who make the grown up decision to work or patronise a smoking establishment?
Generations before us fought against unnecessary tyranny of the majority against the minority, and we are going against what our country has strived for many decades to do(allow each person to have liberty, and live life as he/she wishes, even if they have habits that others may not approve), if we allow the smoking ban bill in its current unfair form to become law. Indiana Senate members should drop the smoking ban bill, if it continues to remain in this flawed way, a la Evanville's expanded ban that sadly passed. Why support flawed legislation, that doesn't allow all adult businesses to determine their smoking policy(or altogether ban indoor smoking, if that business would rather do). as they wish? The 2005 Indianapolis smoking ban, would be a far better and fairer model smoking law, to adopt statewide.