Danny Granger faces big pressure

May 13, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
grangerQuestions linger about Indiana Pacers forward Danny Granger.

Can Granger, who was named yesterday as the NBA’s Most Improved Player for the 2008-09 season, become a lock down defender ala Ron Artest and Kobe Bryant?

Can Granger develop the killer instinct of legends like Michael Jordan and Larry Bird?

But there’s a bigger question. And the future of the Indiana Pacers franchise may depend on it.

Can Danny Granger become the face of the franchise and ignite this city into a blue and gold frenzy the way Reggie Miller did?

Without that, the Pacers will continue to play before empty seats and owners Herb and Mel Simon will continue to lose money. And eventually, someone will ask the question, “Would the Pacers be better off in another market?” Actually, someone slightly north of the U.S. border might already be asking that question.

But Granger is the one person who can put all that to rest, and even may be able to make the blue and gold nation forget the letters C-I-B.

That’s a lot of pressure for a 26-year-old. But the Pacers and city of Indianapolis need this young man to stand up and do more than hit jump shots. They need him to be a leader on and off the court. He is already showing great promise. He says all the right things. Now he needs to do all the right things.

That means showing dedication to training to be the absolute best that he can be. And yes, he can be quite a bit better. Pacers coaches and NBA scouts agree on that. It also means he needs to step up in a big way off the court. Granger is a Louisiana native who played college ball in New Mexico. Now he has to prove to this community that he’s an Indiana guy.

“Danny Granger’s becoming the face of the franchise isn’t going to be done just because he or the franchise wants it to be done,” said David Morton, president of Sunrise Sports Group, a locally based sports marketing consultancy. “It has to be done strategically and over a prolonged period of time. He needs very clear one-, three-, and five-year goals.”

The effort, Morton said, needs to start with Granger replacing Mike Dunleavy on billboards and in Pacers ad campaigns. Morton also called on Sam Perkins, Pacers vice president of player relations, to step forward and craft a plan to take Granger to the next level.

“What do we know about Danny Granger?” Morton asked. “He’s a good jump shooter. Fans need to know more.”

But wait a minute. Didn’t Reggie Miller become the face of the franchise mainly by foisting the Pacers on his shoulders at times, slaying the N.Y. Knicks in Madison Square Garden a time or two and leading the franchise to the 2000 NBA finals. Was it really part of a strategic effort? No, Morton responded, but times are different.

“This franchise is coming off a very difficult period, and the state of the NBA is in a different place,” Morton said. “Danny Granger has to get out in the community, partner with select organizations and causes, and show he really cares about this city. That’s what creates fandom. That’s what sells tickets.”

Creating fandom. Selling tickets. Now that’s something we can all cheer about.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Granger is great and certainly prettier than Troy Murphy. He seems kind of quiet, though. But certainly he's qualified to be the face of the franchise. I love watching him play.
  • Hopefully the stars will align and Granger can be the one the city needs to pull our attention back to this franchise. I miss the atmosphere of the old Pacers, and hope Larry and Granger can take this team to the next level. Stern really did a number on this Franchise. I know some blame it all on the past thugs, but Stern screwed things up as well. That guy needs to go...or the NBA will be a bismal for along time.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT