Indy trails in sponsor exposure race

March 4, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
DarioRecently released data shows NASCAR’s Daytona 500 is still miles ahead of the Indianapolis 500 in terms of value the race delivers to sponsors. But, with the unification of the Indy Racing League and Champ Car, there is much optimism that the 2008 edition will be the most-watched Indianapolis 500 in more than a decade. The open-wheel crown jewel will have to really rev its marketing horsepower to close the gap.

A study compiled by Joyce Julius and Associates, an independent Ann Arbor, Mich.-based media research firm, concluded that Ryan Newman’s victory in this year’s Daytona 500 helped his sponsor, Alltel, receive in-broadcast exposure valued at $22.5 million, including promotional value for Alltel, Alltel Wireless and Alltel.com. Newman’s victory also earned Dodge and Dodge dealers almost $5 million and Mobil Oil about $3.8 million in exposure.

By comparison, the primary sponsor of Dario Franchitti’s winning entry at Indianapolis last year-Canadian Club-received in-broadcast exposure of $3.6 million. To be fair, the 2007 Indy 500 was rain shortened, but the gap between Indy and Daytona would not have been closed under the best weather conditions, sports marketers said. There were, however, bigger winners in sponsor exposure at Indianapolis last year, but all were well behind Alltel. Following are the top 10 at the 2007 Indy 500, according to Joyce Julius.

1.      Motorola $8.1 million
2.      NYSE Group $6.1 million
3.      Target $5.8 million
4.      7-Eleven $5.7 million
5.      Impact! $5.4 million
6.      Vonage $5 million
7.      Argent Mortgage $4.7 million
8.      Canadian Club $3.6 million
9.      Mobil 1 $2.9 million
10.    Bryant Heating & Cooling $2.6 million

 Do you think the gap will be narrowed at Indianapolis this year?
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Narrowed? Yes. Gone? No. Anyone who thinks that a unified series is going to suddenly regain its former luster hasn't been paying attention. Nascar has become a marketing machine, but they are also a different animal. They run 36 races per season compared to the IRL's 17. They are on television week in, week out while the IRL occasionally has back-to-back racing weekends. Drivers in Nascar are more consistent and marketed non-stop. Jeff Gordon's budget compared to Helio Castroneves' car? I bet it's quite a gap.....so you would hope those sponsors in Nascar are getting better exposure. Open wheel is going to have to make some radical changes to trump Nascar. I don't think it will happen. I think the IRL will be a stronger series than it has been, I think the Indy 500 will regain some of it's former glory, but Nascar will be the top dog in the US maybe forever. It's not bad, just different.
  • Sponsor exposure is a function of ratings--the more people watching, the greater the exposure. Few people in the industry take the dollar values seriously because they're 30-sec. TV commercial equivalents. Besides, exposure indicates number of eyeballs, not overall effectiveness. While moving the needle on TV ratings will take time, the IRL can take immediate steps to increase the value of the sponsorships right away, so even if the total value of the sponsorship doesn't equal NASCAR's because of a smaller audience, the IRL can close the gap in effectiveness. The IRL can educate fans about the role of sponsors in supporting the sport to engender sponsor loyalty. And, the IRL can work with sponsors to develop innovative sponsorship activation programs. How about the world's greatest consumer sales promotion to match the world's greatest spectacle? Sounds like fun to me.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How is the private developer going to repay the bonds. Is this going to be a toll road?

  2. As well as a Portillio'S!!!!!!

  3. A Lou Malnati's would be awesome!!!!!!!!

  4. We aren't broke. We just aren't willing to raise revenues for this that we should be raising them.

  5. OK. now that the state is taking illegal immigrants, willing or not. There is a major concern that needs to be addressed. First: School starts here in 3 weeks in most parts of the country and probably in Indiana. So is the state going to vaccinate these kids before they intermingle with our kids in school? The problem we are going to have here in the US and possibly in Indiana is that some of these kids could be carrying health issues or diseases that are pretty much eradicated in the US. This could cause a major health issue in the US. Second: Who is going to pay for this building disaster? We are flat out broke….. Down here in Texas, we have 14 counties that have been so swamped with kids, (numerous thousands of them), they are on the verge of financial collapse. Now this is happening in counties in New Mexico, Arizona and California. The system is massively overloaded. Swine flu has started back up in San Antonio since they have nearly 2500 kids that have been placed there and lice is rampant. Not to be insensitive, but we need to stop this madness. I find it amazing that we cannot take care of our veterans and yet give carte blanche to illegals entering the country. Recently an article mentioned that these kids and teenagers can get on planes without TSA screening? What? What the Hell???? Keep in mind this about protecting our national sovereignty as a nation and also living under the rule of law. Not only the terrorist threat that can come over the border. This is a deliberate and irresponsible and illegal act from administration ignoring the constitutional duty of protecting the borders and also upholding the supreme law of the land. This is a classic Cloward and Piven strategy to overload the system until it collapses.

ADVERTISEMENT