Decision nears on fate of freed-slave sculpture

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indianapolis Cultural Trail founder Brian Payne is walking a public relations tightrope, and it has nothing to do with the seemingly endless construction downtown.

Since last year, controversy has swirled around a piece of art commissioned for the trail’s $2 million public art program. What ultimately happens to Fred Wilson’s “E Pluribus Unum” sculpture of a freed slave could alienate local African-Americans who oppose it or draw the scorn of national art critics.

It’s an ironic situation for Payne, the Central Indiana Community Foundation president who dreamed up the Cultural Trail as a way to draw national attention and visitors to Indianapolis.

Wilson’s proposed piece has spawned public meetings—including a series of discussions set to begin Saturday—talk-radio discussions and ongoing coverage from national art blogger Tyler Green. Along the way, Payne reversed a decision to plan the sculpture in front of the City-County Building.

Wilson has an international reputation for “mining” stereotypical images of African-Americans from museums and repositioning them. In his concept for the Cultural Trail, he seized on the freed slave that’s at the base of the Soldiers and Sailors Monument.

OTB arts Architectural renderings of Fred Wilson’s “E Pluribus Unum.” (Rendering Courtesy CICF)

His sculpture would be a replica of that image, but the man would hold a brightly colored flag representing the African Diaspora.

Payne said the national critics take a back seat when it comes to resolving the issue. “It’s so easy for Tyler Green to sit in his desk and write his blog without having 20 hours of conversation about race and politics and identity,” Payne said.

An Indianapolis group calling itself “Citizens Against Slave Image” has rallied against the project, but it’s not the only local critic.

“I think there’s a better way to communicate African-American history on the trail than a statue of a slave,” said Robin Winston, a former state Democratic chairman and consultant. He proposed in an op-ed column for IBJ erecting a statue of black entrepreneur Madam C.J. Walker instead. Winston said he received 217 e-mail responses that shared his point of view.

Another critic, Carlton Waterhouse, a professor at Indiana University School of Law-Indianapolis, doesn’t object to the fact that “E Pluribus Unum” depicts a slave. But he said it’s inadequate because it shows only a man, not a woman or family.

Payne says the trail’s public art curator, Mindy Taylor Ross, warned that Wilson’s work is more provocative than what one typically finds on public property.

“We thought the idea of having a piece that was more powerful than just decoration was a good thing,” Payne said. “We went into that with our eyes open.”

And he did not expect the heat to come from the black community.

“We thought if there was going to be any controversy with Fred Wilson, it was probably going to come out of the white community,” Payne said. “We were prepared to deal with that.”

CICF created the Cultural Trail and ultimately commissioned its artwork. But Ross recruited a 12-member committee of artists and art professionals to field proposals. Payne noted that two of the members are African-American.

Shortly after getting Wilson’s proposal, Ross set up meetings with local African-American leaders.

“Many were too busy to meet with Fred or deal with the art,” Payne said. “Many liked it. A few of them changed their minds.”

The Cultural Trail also organized a series of meetings, held at the Indianapolis Museum of Art, Madame Walker Theatre and Crispus Attucks Museum in 2010.

Payne admits that those gatherings were attended by dozens, rather than the hundreds of people he’d hoped for. He said concerns expressed at those early meetings prompted a second confab at the Madame Walker, where full-fledged opposition took hold.

Another round of meetings begins Saturday (see schedule, below). Wilson won’t attend the upcoming discussions, which are limited to 20 people and require advance registration.

He did not respond to a request for comment that IBJ placed with the New York gallery that represents him, but Wilson has told Modern Art Notes that he’s OK with “E Pluribus Unum” being moved to a different site.

The piece originally was slated for installation in September. It’s been on hold since early this year.

Meanwhile, the Cultural Trail worked with the Greater Indianapolis Progress Committee’s Race and Cultural Relations Leadership Network to organize the upcoming meetings.

“We are concerned about having people come and have an opportunity to be heard in a respectful environment,” Payne said. “It’s smaller, so it’s more of an intimate discussion.”

Although attendance is limited, he said there will be as many meetings as it takes to fulfill demand.

He hopes to have a decision on the sculpture in December. Who will finally decide? Payne thinks the mayor’s office, CICF board, and the board of Indianapolis Cultural Trail Inc. will consider the feedback and reach a consensus.

“I really am a neutral convener at this point,” he said. “I just want a public process that is fair, that people believe is fair.”

Here is the schedule of meetings:

Oct. 8
11 a.m.-12:30 p.m.
37 Place (formerly IPS School 37)
2605 E. 25th St.
Free parking in the back of the building

Oct. 11
6-7:30 p.m.
Central Indiana Community Foundation
615 N. Alabama St., Suite 119
Meet in conference rooms 6 and 7
Free parking lot to the south of the building
Oct. 13
6-7:30 p.m.
Central Indiana Community Foundation
615 N. Alabama St., Suite 119
Meet in conference rooms 6 and 7
Free parking lot to the south of the building

Registration is required.  Each discussion is limited to 20 participants: adults and children age 12 and older. Discussions are free and open to the public. Registration is available online at www.fredwilsonindy.org and by calling 631-6542, ext. 173. Participants can select their desired meeting and leave their contact information for confirmation.

 script src="http://www.ibj.com/ext/resources/html/social-buttons.js">


  • sorry, you are mistaken
    Sir, I'm sorry, but you are mistaken. Art is art if an ARTIST calls it art. The viewer has absolutely no role in the matter of something being or not being art. If an accountant calls something art then he is simply mistaken. An artist is the only one who can make this proclamation.
  • One word
    Duchamp. Google it.
    I have done an about face on this monument. Why? Because it has, rightly or wrongly, exposed some deep wounds in our city. The opposition has been fierce and determined. Given the deep divisions, racially, in this city, why would anyone, especially city officials, art lovers or politicians want to rub salt into these wounds?

    A humble apology will take great courage, but will pour much needed oil on these wounds. I have every confidence that those who have the power to do whatever they please, will restrain themselves, in the interests of peace.
  • Appropriate Placement?
    On the North side of Fountain Square, near the I65 Fletcher exchange, there is a historical marker about a Black Union Army camp near the location. This might be an appropriate location for the statue, and recognize that Blacks helped to free Blacks.
  • First To Bring It Up
    However, many black people are the first to bring up their "trials and tribulations" because of slavery. Give it a rest already.
  • Wrong Image
    The statue should depict someone that helped African Americans rise from the chains. Forget all that baloney about 'art' and 'artists' and use common sense.
    Something is not art just because the artist says so. 'Art' is determined by the viewer!
    As an example: if I deemed my leaf blower to be art, the viewer would probably disagree.
    • Art is art
      Art doesn't have to be free of controversy, even if its public art. It's one man's message, and I support his right to spread it.
    • Remembrance
      I agree, art is the artist's impression. Much like the Holocaust Museum, it represents a factually embarrassing time in history and should neither be forgotten nor repeated. Too much bru-ha-ha has been made of this though with other major issues out there.
    • Not By Committee
      I can understand the controversy surrounding the piece and why it may be moved from its original suggested location. But sorry, people don't get to suggest what an artist's subject matter should be unless it is a very explicit commission piece. Those folks suggesting subject matter don't really understand the artistic process. Just the fact that piece is evoking strong reaction shows that there is some substance to it.
    • I Thought The Matter Was Resolved
      My understanding was that those who did object to the sculpture, who have not to my knowledge ever been established as speaking for either the majority of local residents, nor the majority of local African-American residents, objected to its location near the City-County Building.

      A decision was made not to locate the sculpture near the City-County Building. It would seem the situation has been resolved.

      Must everything be so complicated? I think the Indianapolis community has far more pressing issues to be concerned about.
    • Live on the edge....
      Let this piece be created and placed as intended. Art is subjective and for discussion, not to please everyone. This could be a step forward, but we are taking 3 back......maybe the Conrad didn't want this piece?
    • placement
      I don't think its that well done, do believe needs to be done with respect and honor freed slaves each deserves. University Park is lovely place.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

    2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

    3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

    4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

    5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.