Developer plans apartments at 707

May 23, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
707 E. North St. A local developer hopes to convert the unfinished eight-story 707 E. North St. condo project into a mostly affordable apartment building with offices on the top floor. The Whitsett Group has agreed to buy the building from Beilouny Luxury Properties, but the deal still must be approved by Cincinnati-based Fifth Third Bank, which has launched foreclosure proceedings. The exterior of the building is finished, but work on the interior stopped in late 2008. The Whitsett plan calls for 40 apartments on the third through seventh floors, with 57-percent affordable and the rest at market rates. The top floor plan would house the company's headquarters, along with community and exercise rooms for apartment tenants. For more on this story, pick up a copy of this weekend's IBJ.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Sounds like a great plan. Downtown is in need of more affordable apartments. Being so close to Mass Ave, these will sell fast.
  • I agree. Affordable housing is just what downtown needs. Putting all your chips in on high priced condos doesn't seem to be working out (market square)...
  • Does anyone know the occupancy rate of Reily Towers(sp)?
  • I do not know. I see ads for them all over IUPUI campus. Honestly Riley Towers is a bit overpriced for what you get. Many of my friends took a look and were not too impressed besides the view. I guess the view is what you are paying strictly for.
  • Any word on what they're doing with the first and second floors?
  • Ablerock: The first two floors are parking.
  • I like this plan. Anything residential on that side of college is a good thing.
  • As a neighbor, I'm very happy to hear this news. I had earlier been told that Fifth Third planned to hold on to the building for awhile until property values began to rebound. I thought apartments made more sense than luxury condos at this location. We have too many luxury condos as it is.
  • Whatever they do, PLEASE don't keep the name Beilouny. 707 could be a cool name, but anything that looks or sounds similar to a processed meat product probably isn't apt for a Luxury Development namesake.

    The half-finished projects are potential steals for these companies. There is no more better example of Buy Low, Sell High than virtually stealing these properties during the market low finishing them out catered toward a more realistic market right as the real estate crunch turns around. Hope it goes through.
  • Apartments are great. The name sucks. I could think of a dozen that would be memorable (and pronouceable) than Beilouny. Big plus to see the first two floors were parking and will not require a surface lot (though it would be better to have SOMETHING to engage the street such as first floor apts right off College.) This seems to really be a nice template of what more MASS AVE area infill could resemble.
  • The name is 707, not Beilouny.
  • JG, Flaherty & Collins last week were chosen to lead the development of the Barton Tower and Lugar Tower parcels. They are building market rate apartments ON Mass Ave. I'm surprised Cory didn't pick up on this story.
  • I actually wrote the story on Barton and Lugar. You can check it out here. Waiting to post on the blog until I can get a rendering.
  • Thanks Cory.

    I hope you'll get a rendering of the Perkins VonDeylen building on Virginia Avenue as well.
  • From what I've read and heard from others in the neighborhood the group purchasing this project specializes in subsidized apartments. Can anyone confirm if this is what their plan is for this building?

    Affordable is a vague term that can mean lots of things.
  • Friends who were looking at Riley Towers last week were told the apartments are at appx. 95% occupancy.
  • Opening Soon~
    707 North Apartments will open June 2010 & is now leasing! Call Jamie 514-9298 for leasing information or any additional questions.
  • WHY LOW INCOME HOUSING?
    Why low income for this area? Why could they not follow what Barrett and Stokely followed when they took over the Maxwell...they maintained the initial integrity of the buidling...keeping higher end condo finishes...with a higher monthly rent to reflect the buidling. This is a huge mistake for downtown...esp the Mass Ave Area!
  • Chicago Apartments for Rent
    Great stuff. I found this while I was looking for Chicago Apartments for Rent

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. liek the rest of America

  2. These quaint,obsessed musings by the stalkers are certainly entertaining, but I'm trying to figure out what, if anything, all the yelping below has to do with Zak Brown.

  3. It's evident that Moffett was pushing the right buttons and corporate America is now trying to squash him. He just wanted to withdraw the free pilot services provided to the company by the pilots to try and put some pressure on a company that has not been interested in negotiating a contract in over 5 years. The company does not provide a contract because not having one has saved them a bundle of money. Shame on any Republic pilots not standing behind their union leader just because things are getting tough, can you not see such strategic moves by the company as putting the last union president in a corporate position and into THEIR pocket. Do you really believe the last union president is so appalled at the attempts by Moffett, do you not remember his oppositions to the company? We stood behind him. It has been proven over and over again for thousands of years without fail, a man cannot serve two masters. Anyone that believes people vote contrary to their paycheck and livelihood deserve to be taken advantage of, the recent statements by the former union president are laughable as he denounces the current union president from his new corporate position. Have you ever seen a drafted sports player score points for his previous team, it cannot be done, he is not on the pilots side anymore, he gets his money a different way now than you and I do, and he should not be allowed to remain on the seniority list. A drafted player brings strength, credibility, tactical knowledge, and a strategic advantage to his NEW team, he would not be drafted or paid were it otherwise. We are all forced to choose only one side to play for and support, not doing so has many references in life such as insider trading and shaving points, all illegal for good reason. This basic fact is why corporate moguls, scientist, and engineers all sign non-discloser agreements and non-compete clauses, as protection in case they are lured into switching sides as our former union president has done. No NFL coach ever drafted a player so that both teams could benefit and better understand each other, they are recruited to win the game against that former team, period. Likewise the company does not recruit the former union president by accident or mutual understanding, its strategy. Don't confuse playing the game with good sportsman-like conduct in support of common business and prosperity goals, with the requirement to only play for one side. Good men we all love and favor fall subject to this manipulation, often without their knowledge, and it is not a betrayal of their friendship to oppose them when they switch sides. If we did not love and trust them, they would not have been chosen and lured to the other side in the first place. The deception by the drafted player is not made at a conscious level, it's just human nature and it's all about money and power which corrupts our ability to be objective and loyal to two masters. This is why our court system created the defense attorney, and why our military created counter intelligence. Its strategy and its propaganda, and it works, and that's why the "powers to be" manipulate the chess pieces by sometimes changing their colors. Some players know they are being manipulated when their color is changed, but it brings them more money and power so they do not care. The rest have good intentions but do not even realize they are being manipulated. This tactic is also known by another name, Divide and Conquer. In battle sending an imperfect message with an imperfect team is obviously not ideal, but it's still being sent by YOUR team, your union leader, a leader that has common goals and common rewards with you, they are the best, because we have elected them to do a job for us. If you are not backing Moffett but believing the spin by those that have recently switched sides, you are taking food out of your own mouth. Showing unity and backing an imperfect situation still results in taking just as much ground, it's about unity and bargaining power. It's not necessary to wait around for that perfect attack because it will never come, the company will spin and attempt to destroy anyone that gets in their way. Ultimately it's not about any specific attack anyway, ASAP or whatever it makes no difference, it is and always has been only about power. If this company cared about safety it would not build pairings with 8 hour overnights, come on, are you that naive? Besides, do you really think Hoffa cares, no, he got a call from corporate America and was squeezed into denouncing Moffett. If he didn't they would spin the safety card against him and the Teamsters National with implication for truckers, future contracts, insurance rates etc...saying something like the Teamsters use safety as a bargaining chip, blah blah blah... Do you really think any pilot is going to do something unsafe for the contract, absolutely not, the only ones threatening safety here is the company with reduced rest, fatigue, and poverty. Do you not find it odd that Hoffa and the Teamsters are opposing a Teamster president publicly? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and work with one of their own? Why did they not sit down and help him strategize, correct any mistakes, and charge ahead? Would the Teamsters National not normally support and leverage a contract for all those pilots that have been paying Teamster dues, isn't that why we have all been paying Teamster dues in the first place? I sure haven't been paying dues so that the Teamsters National could come along and write this kind of an article undercutting our union leader and our unity. Whose side is the Teamsters National really on, it's obviously not the Republic pilots side.

  4. No matter what Moffatt does the company is going to spin it like he is the terrorist and brainwash people like you into believing it, wake up, back your players that are trying to change things for you and your livelihood. Where has Hoffa been for the last 6 years, except collecting our dues. Seriously, do you really think an FO going for upgrade, signed off by a checkairman ready for the upgrade, who then fails, is not even capable of returning as a First Officer.

  5. whoa!

ADVERTISEMENT