Rebirth for Ambassador?

June 9, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
AmbassadorTwo local developers have submitted bids to redevelop the Ambassador apartments adjacent to the Central Library. Van Rooy and Buckingham both proposed mixed uses for the Ambassador building, with street-level retail and commercial space and 60 one-bedroom apartment units on the upper floors. Van Rooy wants to buy the building for $1 million and spend another $3.7 million to update interiors and add features such as a business center, fitness room and a movie theater for residents. In Buckingham’s proposal, the company offers to buy the Ambassador for $865,000 and spend an undisclosed amount to create “high-quality, market-rate� apartments that would rent from $800 to $1,000 per month. Built in 1924, the Ambassador is on the edge of the historic St. Joseph neighborhood. It has been listed on the National Register of Historic Places since 1983. A key issue will be parking. To read more about the proposals, including plans for parking, read reporter Chip Cutter's story here.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Is being old (wow, 84 years...) the only thing that makes this thing historic? It looks like a pretty ordinary brown brick building to me.

    To comment on the article though, it looks like either proposal will be nice.
  • I think this has potential.

    Its in a newly birthed area and both proposals are not going for condos. Perhaps the area doesn't necessarily warrant high end apartments, but I'm curious what 'high end' goes for in Indy... $700?
  • I'm for either development as long as there are no surface parking lots.. I'm also glad it's being planned as apartments and not condos. Sure parking is an issue, but the location is perfect for people who bike/walk instead of driving everywhere.
  • I really hope Buckingham gets this project. They have much better taste than Van Rooy.

    As far as being historic, this building has some great details on it, and one of my favorite arched entrances in the city.

    Here are some shots of the Ambassador I took a few months ago:

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/ablerock/1289357918/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/ablerock/1289355568/
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/ablerock/1288497449/

    If you don't think that's beautiful and worth saving, I can't help you.
  • I live right across the street in Cathcart Apartments on 9th and this is very exciting to see. This building is a huge disappointment to see sitting undeveloped and has huge potential. I also hope Buckingham gets this one.
  • very nice Ablerock, I've only seen it driving by......The details up close look great.....
  • wow, that quote saying the building has no character is ridiculous!
  • i too hope buckingham gets this one...off the subject - has anyone heard about any progress for leasing the ground floor of the gibson building? the last i heard it was supposed to be filled with a grocery store and possibly other retail stores. thanks!
  • Benjamin, go back and reread the quote. It's in reference to the one-story building across the street, and is quite true.
  • One bedrooms with new fixtures in that area will go from about $700 (at probably 600 square feet) up to $1,000 or more for larger apartments with good views.

    The Van Rooy proposal seems more viable to me, as the amenities in the building are necessary to compete with other downtown buildings. Most of the refurbished apartment buildings (Turnverein, Vermont Place, Block, etc.) have exercise rooms at a minimum, and often much more.

    Just curious, why is everyone favoring Buckingham? Better plan, or better track record for the company? Van Rooy has done several of these, with good success. Just seems like it is the more viable choice.
  • When I lived at the Ambassador, I paid $585 per month in rent with free parking. I'm a bibliophile , so for me the bldg's proxmity to the library was its greatest feature. I'd like to see it renovated once again, so others can experience life there. I'm familiar with Van Rooy and I prefer the amenities they offer, but I think their monthly rental rates are too high.This is not Chicago. I believe $700-$800 is what a one bedroom apt. should cost in downtown Indy.
  • Well, I pay $1900 for my one bedroom in Los Angeles, so any of those rates being tossed around seem like heaven to me!
  • From certain apartments at the Ambassador it wouldn't even be necessary to leave your living room to read books in the library!

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. These liberals are out of control. They want to drive our economy into the ground and double and triple our electric bills. Sierra Club, stay out of Indy!

  2. These activist liberal judges have gotten out of control. Thankfully we have a sensible supreme court that overturns their absurd rulings!

  3. Maybe they shouldn't be throwing money at the IRL or whatever they call it now. Probably should save that money for actual operations.

  4. For you central Indiana folks that don't know what a good pizza is, Aurelio's will take care of that. There are some good pizza places in central Indiana but nothing like this!!!

  5. I am troubled with this whole string of comments as I am not sure anyone pointed out that many of the "high paying" positions have been eliminated identified by asterisks as of fiscal year 2012. That indicates to me that the hospitals are making responsible yet difficult decisions and eliminating heavy paying positions. To make this more problematic, we have created a society of "entitlement" where individuals believe they should receive free services at no cost to them. I have yet to get a house repair done at no cost nor have I taken my car that is out of warranty for repair for free repair expecting the government to pay for it even though it is the second largest investment one makes in their life besides purchasing a home. Yet, we continue to hear verbal and aggressive abuse from the consumer who expects free services and have to reward them as a result of HCAHPS surveys which we have no influence over as it is 3rd party required by CMS. Peel the onion and get to the root of the problem...you will find that society has created the problem and our current political landscape and not the people who were fortunate to lead healthcare in the right direction before becoming distorted. As a side note, I had a friend sit in an ED in Canada for nearly two days prior to being evaluated and then finally...3 months later got a CT of the head. You pay for what you get...

ADVERTISEMENT