DINING: Tuscan-do attitude elevates Italian eatery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

Quantity often matters. But bigger isn’t always better.

Take, for instance, the Tomato Bread Soup ($7) at Lorenzo’s Ristorante (15 E. Maryland St., 635-3096). Its pillowy chunks of soaked bread effectively monopolized the tomato/garlic/sage, olive oil/chicken broth it bathed in. And the initial spoonfuls made us glad we ordered it.

Dining Lorenzos Lorenzo’s Red Pepper Pappardella Bolognese is a hearty mound of old-world comfort. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

But a few digs in, it was clear the soup was far too large (and pricy) to be an opening act for an entree. The problem is that it’s all or nothing. The soup was only available as a full bowl, not as a cup.

Similarly, if you want a salad before your lunch at Lorenzo’s, you’re going to have to go for a full portion ($8-$9) or go without. A shame, because I would have considered the Spinach Salad or the Mista Salad if I didn’t have to order a full version. Especially not with a pasta entrée on the way.

That entrée, Red Pepper Pappardella Bolognese ($13) proved to be just what I had hoped—a hearty mound of old-world comfort mixing diced pork, beef and veal with thick noodles in a tomato garlic cream sauce flecked with peppers. It’s the dish Hamburger Helper dreams it could grow up to be.

My dining companion opted for the Chicken Marsala ($15), which was covered with mushrooms in a smooth sauce with a peppery flavor followed by the mellow finish of the wine. A side of green beans complemented nicely.

Both were more satisfying than the Shrimp Ilene ($10), a quintet of sautéed-and-slightly-overcooked shrimp parked in liquid butter and garlic that we had sampled as an appetizer.

Lorenzo’s also has a quartet of sandwiches on the menu (including a vegetarian Caprese Sandwich) and a Caciucco featuring scallops, shrimp, mussels, calamari and salmon. Just try a full bowl of soup before conquering that.

Neither we, nor our waitress, asked about dessert.•

—Lou Harry


Last in a month-long series of reviews of Italian-themed restaurants.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.