DINING: Name change leads to discovery of healthy Asian eatery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

What a difference a name makes.

I must have driven past Sizzling Wok hundreds of times without considering a stop. Every neighborhood has a handful of generically named Asian restaurants. Why bother with this one? (Particularly since it’s parked between a Long John Silver and an abandoned bowling alley.)

But when Sizzling Wok morphed into Pho 54 (7280 N. Michigan Road, 298-9001)—without, I learned later, any change in menu—I stopped in. And stopped in again. And will be back.

ae-apbdiningpho54-2-15col.jpg A massive Vietnamese Pancake for lunch could cause you to skip dinner completely. (IBJ Photos/ Aaron P. Bernstein)

Pho 54 serves both Vietnamese and Chinese dishes with an emphasis on healthier options. Vegetarians have plenty to choose from here. On my first visit, solo, I started with a massive Vietnamese Pancake ($6.95), a crescent of deliciousness consisting of a light rice flour pastry loosely packed with shrimp, pork, bean sprout and onion. Accompanied by lettuce, leeks, cucumber, pickled radishes and carrots, plus nuoc cham sauce for dipping, it should have been shared with others. Being alone, though, and having trouble with temptation, I devoured the whole thing.

This left little room for a steaming bowl of Chicken Pho ($7.95). For newcomers, Pho is a Vietnamese staple soup defined by its white rice noodles and flavorful broth. Its meats, seafood or vegetables can change, but always expect a plateful of sprouts, peppers, lemon or lime and greens to add in at your own discretion. Ideally—as it is here—served very hot, its contents can be spooned, chopsticked or both. Hint: Sip the broth first before piling on the garnishes. Second hint: While sriracha is available to add, resist. As orchestrated here, Pho is delicious without it. If you want kick, add peppers.

In Vietnam, Pho is commonly consumed in the morning, but don’t wait around for that cultural shift to happen here. It makes for a great lunch, encouraging slowing down to soak in the evocative flavors. Expect to be full long before you get halfway through a bowl. (Take out containers are available for what’s left.)

ae-apbdiningpho54-1-15col.jpgA seemingly bottomless bowl of Pho.

On my second visit, with company, I had every intention of trying the Beef Pho ($7.95) and perhaps some other dishes. I did. But an acquaintance and his son, frequenters of the place, insisted that I flip to the back of the menu and try a banh mi sandwich. He was gone before I could thank him for steering me there, where slices of pork and veggie goodness were packed in crunchy bread. A bargain at double the price, it—and four other variations—are absurdly cheap at $3.25.

Not all excelled. A rather wan batch of General Tso’s Chicken (part of a $4.69 lunch special that includes soup, egg roll and rice) was forgotten once we tried the Grilled Chicken ($6.79), a simple but effective combination of marinated chicken and lemongrass. Veggie Spring Egg Roll ($2.49) also transcended, with tiny soy crumbles and carrot beanthread rolled in a light pastry.•

–Lou Harry


Third in a month-long series of reviews of full-flavored restaurants.


  • Pho real
    I agree Lou. I hadn't been to that restaurant since it was Sizzling Wok. I loved that place, but I moved further away, and forgot about it. Definitely worth the drive. On another note, does anyone know what's happening to Ryan Nelson's restaurant in Nora, it looks like they're putting in a Starbucks! I'm super bummed.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing