DINING: Name change leads to discovery of healthy Asian eatery

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

What a difference a name makes.

I must have driven past Sizzling Wok hundreds of times without considering a stop. Every neighborhood has a handful of generically named Asian restaurants. Why bother with this one? (Particularly since it’s parked between a Long John Silver and an abandoned bowling alley.)

But when Sizzling Wok morphed into Pho 54 (7280 N. Michigan Road, 298-9001)—without, I learned later, any change in menu—I stopped in. And stopped in again. And will be back.

ae-apbdiningpho54-2-15col.jpg A massive Vietnamese Pancake for lunch could cause you to skip dinner completely. (IBJ Photos/ Aaron P. Bernstein)

Pho 54 serves both Vietnamese and Chinese dishes with an emphasis on healthier options. Vegetarians have plenty to choose from here. On my first visit, solo, I started with a massive Vietnamese Pancake ($6.95), a crescent of deliciousness consisting of a light rice flour pastry loosely packed with shrimp, pork, bean sprout and onion. Accompanied by lettuce, leeks, cucumber, pickled radishes and carrots, plus nuoc cham sauce for dipping, it should have been shared with others. Being alone, though, and having trouble with temptation, I devoured the whole thing.

This left little room for a steaming bowl of Chicken Pho ($7.95). For newcomers, Pho is a Vietnamese staple soup defined by its white rice noodles and flavorful broth. Its meats, seafood or vegetables can change, but always expect a plateful of sprouts, peppers, lemon or lime and greens to add in at your own discretion. Ideally—as it is here—served very hot, its contents can be spooned, chopsticked or both. Hint: Sip the broth first before piling on the garnishes. Second hint: While sriracha is available to add, resist. As orchestrated here, Pho is delicious without it. If you want kick, add peppers.

In Vietnam, Pho is commonly consumed in the morning, but don’t wait around for that cultural shift to happen here. It makes for a great lunch, encouraging slowing down to soak in the evocative flavors. Expect to be full long before you get halfway through a bowl. (Take out containers are available for what’s left.)

ae-apbdiningpho54-1-15col.jpgA seemingly bottomless bowl of Pho.

On my second visit, with company, I had every intention of trying the Beef Pho ($7.95) and perhaps some other dishes. I did. But an acquaintance and his son, frequenters of the place, insisted that I flip to the back of the menu and try a banh mi sandwich. He was gone before I could thank him for steering me there, where slices of pork and veggie goodness were packed in crunchy bread. A bargain at double the price, it—and four other variations—are absurdly cheap at $3.25.

Not all excelled. A rather wan batch of General Tso’s Chicken (part of a $4.69 lunch special that includes soup, egg roll and rice) was forgotten once we tried the Grilled Chicken ($6.79), a simple but effective combination of marinated chicken and lemongrass. Veggie Spring Egg Roll ($2.49) also transcended, with tiny soy crumbles and carrot beanthread rolled in a light pastry.•

–Lou Harry


Third in a month-long series of reviews of full-flavored restaurants.


  • Pho real
    I agree Lou. I hadn't been to that restaurant since it was Sizzling Wok. I loved that place, but I moved further away, and forgot about it. Definitely worth the drive. On another note, does anyone know what's happening to Ryan Nelson's restaurant in Nora, it looks like they're putting in a Starbucks! I'm super bummed.

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.