IBJOpinion

DINING: Restaurant refills brighten landscape

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Dining - A&E

There are few things sadder than the signage of out-of-business restaurants. The longer the remnants stick around, the more the building and its environs take on the “loser” stigma. And the harder it is to recover.

Which is why, this month, I’m limiting my reviews to restaurants that have filled in where others failed or moved on. Ideally, they quickly wipe out the memory of past tenants.

Let’s see how that plays out in practice.

First up, New Orleans on the Avenue (543 Indiana Ave., 632-4099), which is taking up the two-level digs of Zing, remembered for its sharing plates and terrible signage.

Our visit to the newcomer revealed a good-if-not-yet-as-exciting-as-it-could-be place. A plate of Fried Boudin Balls ($8.50), a trio of crispy sausage orbs served with barbecue sauce proved a promising start.
 

Dining If you can’t make up your mind, the Taste of New Orleans is the way to go. (IBJ Photo/ Perry Reichanadter)

In an effort to maximize my entrée sampling, I picked the Taste of New Orleans, a sampler steeply priced at $16.95. (If a full plate of each of the three items on the plate costs less, why should small cups of each cost more?) The Jambalaya featured rice, chicken, shrimp, and hot and smoked sausage packed with peppers and onions in a smoky tomato sauce. The chicken and sausage gumbo was meaty and dense and the étouffée (which I didn’t realize until later was supposed to be a choice of shrimp or crawfish) took its flavor from the ingredients rather than excessive spicing.

My guest started with a bowl of the Seafood Gumbo ($12.50), in which the shrimp, crabmeat and crawfish weren’t exactly plentiful in an otherwise flavorful roux stock. And the basic Fried Catfish Po-Boy ($12) cried out for cocktail or remoulade sauce. A little more room and we might have tried the Banana Foster Bread Pudding in Caramel Rum Sauce or the Dump Cake.

Free parking, albeit limited, is a plus for those looking for a short escape from downtown proper. Service was friendly and attentive. And the atmosphere was surprisingly low-key. I hope New Orleans on the Avenue will develop a bit more atmosphere as it evolves.

A bit farther west, near Indiana University Hospital, DJ’s Hot Dog Co. (923 Indiana Ave., 423-8936) has moved into what used to be Hot Box Pizza (before it migrated downtown). Since this plaza already has more than its share of pizza providers, a decent dog hut would certainly be an upgrade.

D.J.’s does that a bit better. My visit included the signature 100 percent beef Chicago Dog ($3.79), buried but not lost in mustard, onion, bright neon relish, tomato, sport peppers, cucumbers, celery salt and an impossible-to-stay-balanced dill pickle.

Equally difficult to manage—and equally enjoyable—was an Atlanta Dog ($3.79) served with a soupy Cincy-style chili along with onions and shredded cheese. A regular combo, which includes a fountain drink and a smallish portion of crinkle-cut fries, adds $2.19 to the bill.

If you’re not in a dog mood, there’s more. D.J.’s also has Italian Beef sandwiches, burgers and Italian sausage.

Pluses beyond the food: D.J.’s is roomy, there’s free wi-fi (well, sort-of: The guy at the counter advised me to connect to Marco’s Pizza across the parking lot), and my table was cleaned off by an attentive staff member before I even got out the door.•

–Lou Harry

__________

First in a month-long series of visits to eateries that have recently moved into the digs of former eateries.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT