Dome demolition details announced

April 28, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
The signs of the 25-year-old RCA Dome are coming down next week. The building which helped lure the Indianapolis Colts here from Baltimore will follow. 

The Indiana Stadium and Convention Building Authority this afternoon announced detailed plans for demolishing the RCA Dome to make room for an expansion of the Indiana Convention Center. Taking down the Dome is expected to include a combination of traditional demolition and targeted implosion. 

“Last October, we announced the steps and timetable for the removal of the Dome and expansion of the Convention Center,” said David Frick, board chairman of the ISCBA. “We’re now able to provide more of the details involved with the project, which will be completed by fall, 2010.”

According to the project’s construction manager, a joint venture of Shiel Sexton/Powers and Sons, the process of demolishing the Dome started in January, as previously announced, with the relocation of major electrical, steam and chilled water lines crossing the site, plus the relocation of a major sewer in South Street. In addition, combined electrical and mechanical systems serving the Convention Center and RCA Dome needed to be separated. This work is about 90 percent completed and is expected to be finished by early summer.

“In early May, the public will see removal of the RCA signs on the Dome with the street barricades set in place shortly thereafter,” said Tom Scheele, senior vice president of Shiel Sexton Inc. “We then expect to begin demolishing offices, restrooms, meeting rooms and storage areas inside the Dome before the end of spring, which involves the removal of components that don’t comprise the structural fame itself – items such as drywall, acoustical ceilings, doors, carpet and light fixtures.”

Next, according to Scheele, will be the salvage and memorabilia removal starting in July and a month later the deflation of the roof. “Deflation of the roof will be a visual reminder that we are now initiating the structural demolition sequence,” said Scheele.

“Once about two-thirds of the demolition is complete, new construction and Dome demolition will be going on concurrently,” said Scheele. The total demolition is expected to last about five months and will move from north to south so construction can begin on the new three-story Georgia Street entrance expansion. 

The Indianapolis Colts, who moved from Baltimore and began playing in the Dome in 1984, will open up their season this fall in the $725 million Lucas Oil Stadium, less than a mile south of their former home.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • Less than a mile? In Indy, we call that across the street, canted for no good reason and much more expensive than anyone guessed.
  • I wonder what the cost of the demoltion and all the clean up will cost? I bet that's not included in the construction costs either.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT