Dozens of judges to visit schools for Constitution Day

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Nearly four dozen Indiana county and appellate judges plan to visit 119 schools across the state this week in honor of Constitution Day.

The judges will primarily visit K-12 schools and most will distribute pocket-sized versions of the state constitution, the federal constitution and the Declaration of Independence to students.

“Primarily it’s meant to be fun, to reach out, to give them something to think about when they go home,” said Indiana Supreme Court Justice Steven David. He will be traveling to Zionsville Middle School on Monday to speak with two classes.

The judicial officers will be free to talk about whatever they choose, but they are encouraged to base their discussions on questions from students, said Elizabeth Osborn, coordinator for court history and public education at the Indiana Supreme Court.

David said he plans to introduce himself, discuss the three branches of government and go over the state and federal constitutions. He said the questions he receives often range from what pets he has to “relevant, pertinent, thought-out questions.”

In all, two Indiana Supreme Court justices, one appellate judge and 41 county and circuit court judges are participating in the Constitution Day visits. However, a few, like David, will have to conduct their visits on days other than Tuesday, the official holiday.

All judicial officers across the state received a letter encouraging them to arrange their own visits with schools of their choice. At the same time, some teachers received notifications inviting them to reach out to their local judicial officers to ask for meetings.

“We think it is very important for the judges to have the opportunity to interact with kids on how the judicial system works,” Osborn said. “Constitution Day seemed like the perfect day.”

“It is very important,” Justice David said. “I very much enjoy doing it.”

The Indiana Supreme Court began Constitution Day programming and activates in 2005, a year after the late U.S. Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia added an amendment to a federal spending bill requiring schools that receive federal funding to offer programs annually on Sept. 17.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Once a Marion Co. commuter tax is established, I'm moving my organization out of Indianapolis. Face it, with the advancement in technology, it's getting more cost effective to have people work out of their homes. The clock is running out on the need for much of the office space in Indianapolis. Establishing a commuter tax will only advance the hands of the clock and the residents of Indianapolis will be left to clean up the mess they created on their own, with much less resources.

  2. The 2013 YE financial indicates the City of Indianapolis has over $2 B in assets and net position of $362.7 M. All of these assets have been created and funded by taxpayers. In 2013 they took in $806 M in revenues. Again, all from tax payers. Think about this, Indianapolis takes in $800 M per year and they do not have enough money? The premise that government needs more money for services is false.

  3. As I understand it, the idea is to offer police to live in high risk areas in exchange for a housing benefit/subsidy of some kind. This fact means there is a choice for the officer(s) to take the offer and receive the benefit. In terms of mandating living in a community, it is entirely reasonable for employers to mandate public safety officials live in their community. Again, the public safety official has a choice, to live in the area or to take another job.

  4. The free market will seek its own level. If Employers cannot hire a retain good employees in Marion Co they will leave and set up shop in adjacent county. Marion Co already suffers from businesses leaving I would think this would encourage more of the same.

  5. We gotta stop this Senior crime. Perhaps long jail terms for these old boozers is in order. There are times these days (more rather than less) when this state makes me sick.