Draft picks could draw boos, cheers

June 26, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
With the NBA draft just a few hours away, the rumors are running rampant. Speculators have any number of players going to the Indiana Pacers. Some of the projected selections are sure to have fans at tonight’s draft party at Conseco Fieldhouse cheering, while others—if selected—will have fans of the blue and gold booing. Some selections could make fans grumpy despite the free chow handed out to the first 2,500 through the turnstiles.

It should be an interesting evening at Conseco Fieldhouse.

But booing fans aren’t always right. I’m sure you remember the reaction when the Pacers drafted Reggie Miller over Hoosier Steve Alford.

So here’s your chance to weigh in before the draft. Listed below are a number of players the Pacers could select with their draft picks at No. 11 and 17. Tell us if you think the selections below are worthy of booing or cheering.

Likely candidates at No. 11: Texas’ D.J. Augustin, Ohio State’s Kostas Koufos, Arizona’s Jerryd Bayless, West Virginia’s Joe Alexander, LSU’s Anthony Randolph.

Likely candidates at No. 17: Georgetown’s Roy Hibbert, Kansas’ Mario Chalmers, Texas A&M’s DeAndre Jordan, Stanford’s Robin Lopez, Florida’s Marreese Speights.

This is your chance to call the shots.
  • Augustin - cheer
    Koufos - big round of boos
    Bayless - uproarious cheer
    Alexander - booooooo hiss!
    Randolph - yikes! boo

    Hibbert - probably worth a cheer and a boo
    Chalmers - yahoo! cheer!
    Jordan - cheer with some trepidation
    Lopez - boohoo!
    Speights - Boo! Who!? BooBoo!
  • Loud cheers for Augustin, Hibbert and Chalmers.
  • I have to tell you Alexander from W. Va. has some serious upside. I wouldn't be so quick to boo that choice. In fact I think I would give it a cheer. Bayless, to me, is more of a mix of boos and cheers. So too is Koufos.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. PJ - Mall operators like Simon, and most developers/ land owners, establish individual legal entities for each property to avoid having a problem location sink the ship, or simply structure the note to exclude anything but the property acting as collateral. Usually both. The big banks that lend are big boys that know the risks and aren't mad at Simon for forking over the deed and walking away.

  2. Do any of the East side residence think that Macy, JC Penny's and the other national tenants would have letft the mall if they were making money?? I have read several post about how Simon neglected the property but it sounds like the Eastsiders stopped shopping at the mall even when it was full with all of the national retailers that you want to come back to the mall. I used to work at the Dick's at Washington Square and I know for a fact it's the worst performing Dick's in the Indianapolis market. You better start shopping there before it closes also.

  3. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  4. If you only knew....

  5. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.