Drug-spending increase highest in four years

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Spending on pharmaceuticals in the United States rose more in 2009 than in the previous three years, driven by a 9.2-percent increase in branded-drug prices and a jump in children treated for chronic conditions.

The amount paid for drugs increased 3.7 percent, compared with 3.3 percent in 2008, according to a report Wednesday from Medco Health Solutions Inc., the largest pharmacy benefits manager by revenue. Branded-drug prices increased each year since 2005, when they rose 6.3 percent, Medco said.

Spending for treatments used by children up to age 19 grew four times faster than the overall population, Medco said. One in four insured children with chronic conditions, led by diabetes and attention deficit disorder, is taking drugs, such as Eli Lilly and Co.’s schizophrenia drug Zyprexa, once prescribed only for adults.

“Children are looking like little versions of adults when it comes to chronic illness,” said Robert Epstein, chief medical officer at Medco, which is based in New Jersey but has major operations in central Indiana.

The price increase was fueled by the debate over the health-care overhaul in Washington, D.C., Medco CEO David Snow said in a conference call. The increases began about the same time Congress was asking the drugmakers to contribute to funding as part of the health-care bill.

“The tax is a legitimate cost of business and it will be passed through to the end users,” Snow said.

Pharmaceutical companies agreed to contribute $90 billion during the next decade to help finance the health-care overhaul. That includes $28 billion in new taxes as well as 50-percent discounts for elderly customers who buy through Medicare’s prescription drug program.

AARP, formerly the American Association of Retired Persons, found a similar trend in brand-name drug inflation, with prices rising 9.7 percent, the most since 2002. Overall, the U.S. consumer price index fell 0.3 percent last year, said John Rother, executive vice president for policy at the Washington-based association. AARP released the study May 17.

Rother said the increases beginning in 2007 reflect “an effort to compensate” for the fact that the pipeline of drugs under development doesn’t have many blockbusters.

“The drug companies can blame the increases on health reform,” Rother said. “But they got a pretty good deal. I think it’s more of a feeling, ‘Let’s get it while we can.’”

The Medco 2010 Drug Trend Report is based on a compilation of claims data from the company’s biggest 200 clients, with about 40 million plan participants cumulatively.

Biologic Drugs

Spending on biologic drugs used to fight cancer, rheumatoid arthritis and multiple sclerosis climbed 14.7 percent, as use of therapy rose 2.6 percent and prices climbed 12.1 percent, the Medco data show. More than half of the increase in drug spending reported in 2009 was attributable to such specialty therapies.

For the third straight year, diabetes was the biggest contributor to the increase, accounting for 16.7 percent of the growth, according to the study.

Higher rates of obesity among children produced more reliance on diabetes drugs such as Osaka, Japan-based Takeda Pharmaceutical Co.’s Actos and New Jersey-based Merck & Co.’s Januvia. Other obesity-related treatments that rose include London-based AstraZeneca Plc’s Atacand for hypertension and New York-based Pfizer Inc.’s Protonix to alleviate gastroesophageal reflux disease.

In 2007, the American Diabetes Association estimated that 186,300 children under age 20 had diabetes in the U.S. An additional 2 million, ages 12 to 17—about 1 in every 6 overweight adolescents—were prediabetic. There are 23.5 million over 20 who are diabetic and 55 million prediabetic.

“While there are twice as many adults that are prediabetic compared with those that are diabetic, there are 10 times as many children,” Epstein said.

Drugs for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, such as Zyprexa and AstraZeneca’s Seroquel, were another growth area, particularly for adults ages 20 to 34 whose spending rose 21 percent. Overall, spending in the category climbed 24 percent and was the fourth-leading driver of expenditures, Medco said.


  • Diabetes savings
    What is the economic burden of diabetes? Proper mgmt and control could save 49,000 lives and $196 million annually. http://www.healthcaretownhall.com/?p=2699
  • Drugs
    Take a look at the ads on TV. No wonder the sales a escalating. In many cases the side effects are worse than the malady the drug purports to treat.
  • Longterm Zyprexa diabetes
    Eli Lilly promotes sales of their #1 drug (Zyprexa $4.8 billion per year) that can *cause* diabetes and then turns around and makes billions selling more drugs to treat the diabetes.
    Eli Lilly's # 1 cash cow Zyprexa has been over-prescribed and linked to a 10-times greater risk of causing type #2 diabetes and increased risk of heart attack.
    At 5 to ten times the cost of the old standby thorazine,recent comparative studies show the diabetes inducing zyprexa class of drugs are only borderline better in controlling symptoms.
    Only 9 percent of adult Americans think the pharmaceutical industry can be trusted right around the same rating as big tobacco. No Wonder!
    Daniel Haszard

Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. why oh why does this state continue to elect these people....do you wonder how much was graft out of the 3.8 billion?

  2. i too think this is a great idea. I think the vision and need is there as well. But also agree with Wendy that there may be better location in our city to fulfill this vision and help grow the sports of hockey and figure skating in Indy. Also to help further develop other parts of the city that seem often forgotten. Any of the other 6 townships out side of the three northernmost could benefit greatly from a facility and a vision like this. For a vision that sounds philanthropic, the location is appears more about the money. Would really like to see it elsewhere, but still wish the development the best of luck, as we can always use more ice in the city. As for the Ice growth when they return, if schedules can be coordinated with the Fuel, what could be better than to have high level hockey available to go see every weekend of the season? Good luck with the development and the return of the Ice.

  3. How many parking spaces do they have at Ironworks? Will residents have reserved spaces or will they have to troll for a space among the people that are there at Ruth Chris & Sangiovese?

  4. You do not get speeding ticket first time you speed and this is not first time Mr.Page has speed. One act should not define a man and this one act won't. He got off with a slap on the wrist. I agree with judge no person was injured by his actions. The state was robbed of money by paying too much rent for a building and that money could have been used for social services. The Page family maybe "generous" with their money but for most part all of it is dirty money that he obtained for sources that are not on the upright. Page is the kind of lawyer that gives lawyers a bad name. He paid off this judge like he has many other tine and walked away. Does he still have his license. I believe so. Hire him to get you confiscated drug money back. He will. It will cost you.

  5. I remain amazed at the level of expertise of the average Internet Television Executive. Obviously they have all the answers and know the business inside and out.