IBJNews

Duke Realty reports strong quarterly results

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The sale of several properties helped Duke Realty Corp. record strong earnings in the first quarter, the Indianapolis-based real estate investment trust announced Thursday morning.

Duke reported a profit in the three-month period of $47.6 million, or 19 cents a share, compared with a loss of $15.3 million, or 7 cents a share, in the same quarter a year earlier.

Revenue increased 19 percent, to $386.9 million.

Sales of properties totaling 2 million square feet generated $456 million overall and gains of $79.5 million, the company said. Nearly $275 million was generated by the sale of 13 office buildings located mostly in the Midwest to an existing joint venture with Los Angeles-based CB Richard Ellis.

“These dispositions in combination with our industrial acquisitions over the last few quarters are a major step in achieving our asset strategy,” Duke Realty CEO Dennis D. Oklak said in a prepared statement.

The company has undertaken a strategy to shed a slew of office space within its portfolio of properties in favor of industrial investments.

Duke Realty reported first-quarter funds from operations, a key measure for REITs, of $71.8 million, or 27 cents a share, compared with FFO of $63.9 million, or 28 cents a share, in the prior-year period.

Adjusted for preferred share buybacks, FFO for the quarter was 28 cents a share, the company said.

The company reaffirmed its 2011 FFO of between $1.06 and $1.18.

The occupancy rate for Duke Realty’s portfolio of projects, including those under development, was 88.9 percent at the end of March, down slightly from 89.1 percent at the end of December.

The price of company shares has increased nearly 50 percent since they hit a 52-week low of $10.19 in December. Shares opened trading Thursday morning at $15.21, down slightly from a 52-week high of $15.26 reached on Monday.
 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. In my opinion the estridge companies are crooks. They filed bankruptcy on their 'track housing' side of the business two weeks before they closed on one of my clients' homes. When my client first interviewed Estridge as a builder 6 months before, they specifically ASKED about the solvency of their business, knowing that some builders were struggling. Estridge truly misrepresented their financial situation at that time. I suppose I am more unhappy with the whole system than I am with the builder because what the heck==you can file bankruptcy on 'track homes' but still keep building and make money off of 'custom built' homes??? How ridiculous! They are all homes. How can a company be allowed to bilk thousands of dollars from their subcontractors but still be allowed to build houses?? they should have been made to pay back all their unpaid contractors before being allowed to profit from building any more houses! This alone makes them and the system crooks in my eyes. I would never build an estridge home and I would not recommend for my clients either. If they were truly 'bankrupt' how could they afford to keep building homes anyway??? The whole system needs fixed.

  2. I live a couple blocks east of the Angie's campus and my house is assessed for ~$160,000. If I could get that amount, let alone $384,000 (a 140% bonus), I'd sell in a minute. Either Angie's stockholders just got fleeced, or Angie's is getting about a 58% discount on their property taxes, if these properties are actually worth what they paid Mr. Oesterle for them. Which do you think is the case?

  3. Perhaps the IMA board is really to blame! They agreed to hire Charles. They can't seemingly find donors among themselves, or bring in new blood that will support the museums operating budget with an expanded museum and money to provide curators with something to do (ie buy art). The headlines of disarray at the museum and mass firings are hurting the reputation of the museum for some time to come. If people on the board had misgivings, perhaps they shpuld have more forcefully opposed efforts that they have seemingly been unable to fund, like expansion and the costs it has created!

  4. See, I told u Indyman and Dipsicle....this 8 days is overkill. It's barely worth a weekend....great job Tony George! Your dream has been fulfilled....he fans want the I r l back. Thats how good it was.....and that sucked.

  5. I have been in training for a short time now but right off I can see that safety and quality are the number one issues, my experience as of late has been a positive one, the employees along with Jeff the plant manager and the operation supervisor as well as the engineers are a highly motivated group of people, what an asset for the area to have and for company's in need of a quality metal products.

ADVERTISEMENT