IBJNews

Durham asks to move back into his mansion

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Indicted financier Tim Durham has asked a federal judge to allow him to move from his sister’s home in Geist back to his own, 20,000-square-foot mansion in Fortville.

Durham has been living on home detention at his sister’s house since his April arrest on 12 felony counts.  

His motion to move to his mansion was made under seal. But federal prosecutors, in an objection filed on Monday, said Durham made the motion because his sister is concerned for her safety due to threats made against Durham.

Prosecutors argued that allowing Durham to live in a house built partly with Fair Finance Co. investor money is “tantamount to letting him enjoy the fruits of his crime, as alleged by the grand jury.” The judge has not ruled on his request.

A 23-page grand jury indictment alleges that Durham and business partner James F. Cochran worked with former Fair Finance Chief Financial Officer Rick D. Snow to devise and execute a scheme to defraud investors in the Akron, Ohio-based company.

Authorities say that after Durham bought Fair in 2002, he doled out related-party loans with abandon, leaving the company unable to repay Ohio residents who purchased unsecured investment certificates boasting interest rates as high as 9.5 percent. More than 5,200 investors are owed more than $230 million.

Durham, Cochran and Snow have denied wrongdoing.
 
Further objecting to Durham’s latest motion, federal prosecutors argue that he should not be living in a house that is in foreclosure due to his own inability to maintain mortgage payments.

They also believe two of the three individuals living in Durham’s mansion are potential witnesses in their case against him. Durham said in his motion that one of the individuals has agreed to move out if his request is granted.

“If Durham does not want to live with his sister any longer, he should be given an opportunity to find a residence that is not implicated in the fraud and where potential witnesses do not also reside,” prosecutors wrote.

Last month, Judge Jane Magnus-Stinson denied Durham’s request to relax restrictions of his home detention. He had asked the court to modify the conditions of his release to visit his attorney’s office more frequently and to travel to California up to 12 days a month.

Durham is acting CEO of National Lampoon Inc. in Los Angeles.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Why not stay in Jail
    What is Tim Durham to good to cool his heels in county lock-up???? If his life is being threatened he has no one but his greed self to blame! How many folks are just trying to get by on meager savings an SSI. I think every thing should be taken and sold. Keep a pair of jeans, shirt, boots and a coat. He should have to payback every red cent. Sick of crooks like this always getting the breaks.
  • Invitation
    Mr. Durham can stay at out farm and work off what he took from us. Alternatively be can hide away from his detractors in our local jail.
  • Sister
    Doesn't his sister have children? She's concerned about her safety and not her chilldren's?
    Can he prove the death threats or is he using that as an excuse to move back to the mansion?
  • Sister's house
    The house he is living in with his siter is also in Foreclosure
  • Why??
    Who is, and why are people living in this house? Why isnt this in the article...duh. If i forclosed on my house I doubt the bank would let other people live there while in foreclosure. It's crazy how the rich live by a completely different set of rules than a us middle classers. Exactly why we need a full turnover in the house and senate.
    • He has options
      For everyones safety, maybe he should go back to the halfway house on Capitol Avenue, Prison in Pendelton, or maybe call Mitch about using the empty Governor's mansion.

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. John, unfortunately CTRWD wants to put the tank(s) right next to a nature preserve and at the southern entrance to Carmel off of Keystone. Not exactly the kind of message you want to send to residents and visitors (come see our tanks as you enter our city and we build stuff in nature preserves...

    2. 85 feet for an ambitious project? I could shoot ej*culate farther than that.

    3. I tried, can't take it anymore. Untill Katz is replaced I can't listen anymore.

    4. Perhaps, but they've had a very active program to reduce rainwater/sump pump inflows for a number of years. But you are correct that controlling these peak flows will require spending more money - surge tanks, lines or removing storm water inflow at the source.

    5. All sewage goes to the Carmel treatment plant on the White River at 96th St. Rainfall should not affect sewage flows, but somehow it does - and the increased rate is more than the plant can handle a few times each year. One big source is typically homeowners who have their sump pumps connect into the sanitary sewer line rather than to the storm sewer line or yard. So we (Carmel and Clay Twp) need someway to hold the excess flow for a few days until the plant can process this material. Carmel wants the surge tank located at the treatment plant but than means an expensive underground line has to be installed through residential areas while CTRWD wants the surge tank located further 'upstream' from the treatment plant which costs less. Either solution works from an environmental control perspective. The less expensive solution means some people would likely have an unsightly tank near them. Carmel wants the more expensive solution - surprise!

    ADVERTISEMENT