D'vine move clears way for big project

June 5, 2007
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Premier Properties has taken another step toward its ambitious plan for Woodfield Crossing. The company has a deal to relocate D'vine A Wine Bar from an existing retail building on the Woodfield property to another building it owns. EchelonD'vine is moving into the former home of Cibo Italian restaurant in the Echelon (northwest of 82nd Street and Allisonville Road, pictured here). The wine bar began working on the space this week and will take a total of 5,500 square feet on the first floor and mezzanine. The old 3,200-square-foot location will remain open until the new space is available. Premier plans to raze the former home of D'vine as part of a redevelopment project that calls for a 5,000-seat theater, hundreds of condos and more than a million square feet of office and retail space. The owner of D'vine, Bennet Ackerman, said he'd move into the new project "in a heartbeat" if Premier offers the opportunity.
A D'vine bonus: The wine bar also is working on a deal to open a new location in downtown Carmel.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • braingirlJune 6, 2007 8:32 AM
    People had been asking me where D'Vine was going to be moving. Putting them in the restaurant spot below Vizion is a perfect idea.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • braingirlJune 6, 2007 2:03 PM
    D'oh -- I mean in the old Vizion and old Cibo space. The space is below Gelo (nee Vapour Lounge). I can't keep all my clubs and restaurants straight anymore.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • ChrisJune 6, 2007 3:26 PM
    Does this mean that Cibo/Gelo is closing its operations or simply moving to another location? Anyone have any further information on Cibo's status?
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment
  • JasmineJune 12, 2007 10:26 AM
    CIBO is closed for business (www.ciboindy.com) but GELO will remain open on certain nights - I think Wed, Fri & Sat.
    Reply to CommentFlag Comment

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

ADVANCED SEARCH
Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT