IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Raising parking fees is wise step

IBJ Staff
August 14, 2010
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
IBJ Editorial

It isn’t difficult to grasp the reasoning behind Mayor Greg Ballard’s proposal to privatize the city’s parking operations. The $4 million to $8 million a year in additional revenue an outside operator would pour into the city’s depleted coffers would certainly come in handy for improving streets, sidewalks and alleys in the targeted areas of Broad Ripple and downtown.

But that extra revenue would be squeezed out of drivers by doubling or tripling parking fees, and the steep increases might trigger the unintended consequence of eroding hard-fought gains in downtown redevelopment.

Given the pressures the city is under to find revenue, it would be too much to ask Ballard to reconsider the proposal altogether. But phasing in steep fee increases should be on the table.

The city unveiled the proposals last week after issuing a request for qualifications in February. Indianapolis wants a private operator to take over all 3,600 metered parking spaces in downtown and Broad Ripple and several downtown garages.

City leaders this week expect to recommend one of seven finalists chosen from an initial list of 16. The City-County Council could take up the proposal as soon as Aug. 23.

Hourly parking rates at meters would climb from 75 cents to $1.50, and downtown metered parking would end at 9 p.m. instead of 6 p.m.

The city points out that parking fees haven’t been raised since 1975. That’s a legitimate argument, one running along the lines of Gov. Mitch Daniels’ contention when he leased the Indiana Toll Road four years ago that tolls hadn’t been raised in two decades.

The proposal also has merit because parking rates are cheap here compared to other cities.

But the prospect of shelling out more quarters could drive away paying customers. Swiping a credit card in one of the new proposed electronic meters might be an easier psychological leap than digging deeper into pockets for more change, but there’s no guarantee that $1.50 for just one hour will find acceptance.

Simon Property Group Inc. understood this dynamic when it opened Circle Centre mall in 1995. The downtown mall offered the first three hours of parking for just $1. The price is now $1.50 for the first three hours, but it’s still a bargain and continues to blunt some of the hesitation shoppers harbor about making the trek.

A phase-in would give both consumers and businesses time to absorb the mental shock of the increases and delay the greatest impacts until the economy improves.

Meters could still be fed later in the day, as the city proposes, which should help the city and retailers accomplish the goal of creating more turnover in the parking spaces. More customers means more revenue for shopkeepers.

As it is, too many people hog spaces for hours at a time instead of using a garage or parking lot.

Whatever Ballard decides, maintaining downtown’s appeal should be the primary goal. Shiny appearances to the contrary, downtown still needs coddling.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.


ADVERTISEMENT
  • There is Already No Such Thing As Free Parking
    So-called "free parking" is already very costly. On street "free parking" is really subsidized parking paid for by all taxpayers to provide and maintain parking meters and parking enforcement, and by developers through extra costs created by parking requirements imposed by zoning regulations, and these costs are passed on to residential and commercial tenants and homebuyers.

    Street parking rates have been the same for the past 30 years or so, and it is about time they were increased to more closely reflect the actual cost of providing so-called "free parking." It is time for more transparency in government services and government mandates imposed on private parties, such as developers. Costs should be fully transparent, directly funded and FULLY funded.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Well, we could blame ABC because they haven't advertised the INDY 500....not during the HUGE TV rating shows like Dancing with the Stars (of which IICS driver Helio Castroneves is a former champion). He never won a CART championship, did he?

    We could blame the new car...because it's ugly and has a V6 that has less horsepower than the pace car. CART (to my knowledge) never had that problem with cars they presented at the speedway years 1979 through 1995.

    We could blame the fencepost, but that would be crass. Or maybe Danica? Or maybe Jean Alesi....or boost increases from constant rules tampering. Maybe we could blame Penske who still is winning everything as usual.

    Maybe we can blame the world for not understanding the the great Indy gods who regularly twist things in such ways that we mere mortals must only accept, but never question.

    So, it does beg the question....who is responsible if the series and Indy continues to flounder? Are the responsibilities so diffuse and complicated that no one really is to blame for it's fall from grace?

    I urge the speedway to sign on for 7 more years of ABC coverage and 7 more years of NBC Sports Network coverage. It been win-win so far....*cough* *cough*

  2. "They're problem was thinking they were bigger than the institution that made their existence possible. That turned out to be a mistake."

    The above quote made by Disciple shows his continued inability to grasp a simple concept: CART is dead. Twice. It provided a brilliant stage for some of the best open wheel racing in all the past century of racing. It's gone DOOD, get over it.

    PLEASE explain, Mr. Disciple of INDYCAR, why you continually hammer home, even on the eve of the 2012 Indy 500, this same point...over and over? Seriously, why does the legacy of CART haunt you so much?

    The same problems that affected the sport for over a century of AOW racing STILL affect it now. Your answers (or lack thereof) belittle the very sport you claim to love. Indy rots in your hands yet you request status quo. You negate salient points with drivel...always.

    Indy is not going to die. But, it is dying...are you willing to accept that? "Indy is a hot mess"....it's true. Yet you want it that way? What is wrong with you?

  3. I just want to make sure I am reading this right - Wellpoint is eliminating 112 employees. Wellpoint is a customer of Repucare. Repucare is creating 82 jobs. I sure hope they are hiring Wellpoint employees. Does not make sense!

  4. Triscuts...love um!

  5. Of course the fair will go on. Don't you big city reporters understand county fairs? Get outside the beltway and see what life is really like!

ADVERTISEMENT