IBJOpinion

EDITORIAL: Simon could score for city library

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
IBJ Editorial

In the final years of his life, Mel Simon became a philanthropist of national repute. Headline gifts included $50 million for Indiana University and $17 million for Riley Hospital for Children.

Mel’s largesse came to mind as we began pondering the future of Indianapolis’ troubled library system. At the same time Mel’s brother Herb has come to the city hat in hand seeking help for the ailing Indiana Pacers, the Indianapolis-Marion County Public Library board is contemplating closing six branches.

Mel, who died last year at age 82, isn’t around to make a game-changing donation to the library’s foundation that would put the system on solid, long-term financial footing. But perhaps it’s time for Herb—a billionaire like his brother—to burnish his own credentials as a philanthropist who makes the city a better place to live and work.

It’s not realistic to expect Herb, the 75-year-old co-founder of Simon Property Group, to run the Pacers without regard to the bottom line. He didn’t achieve what he has in business with that mind-set. And keeping the team here for decades to come necessitates that it operate under a viable business model.

But philanthropy is different. A donation into an endowment that helps cover library operating expenses would have an impact on quality of life in Indianapolis far beyond his lifetime. And it would create good will for Herb and the Pacers at one of the most critical junctures in the franchise’s history.

It’s easy to talk about how other people should spend their money, of course. And the Pacers’ and library’s financial woes aren’t really related. It’s not as if a rescue package for the team would come from the same pot of money as funds to keep the lights on and doors open at library branches.

Still, we have this nagging feeling that if the branches close but the Pacers get their money, this community has its priorities out of whack.

Some of the branches slated for closing sit in poor neighborhoods, providing a haven for young people who have ample opportunity to find trouble. It’s hard to rationalize shuttering those sites but bailing out a rich sports-team owner.

The Simon family already has demonstrated a commitment to helping the less fortunate. Its Simon Youth Foundation focuses on providing educational opportunities to at-risk youth, and the Pacers Foundation funds programs that help kids make good life choices.

Herb Simon himself is a voracious reader. He recently purchased Kirkus Reviews, a book-review magazine, saying his “love of books makes me want to be part of the solution for the [troubled] book publishing industry.”

So perhaps Herb’s making a generous gift for the library isn’t just wishful thinking. And it might make business sense as well. Indianapolis residents never are going to be wild about a Pacers bailout, especially at a time the economy is sputtering and many are struggling to feed their families and pay their bills. But it would go over better if the team owner made a donation demonstrating his deep concern for the broader community.•

__________

To comment on this editorial, write to ibjedit@ibj.com.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • iAgree.
    Very nicely thought out and executed editorial. I appreciate your not making claims, accusations, nor otherwise presenting unfounded information. This article speaks well to the optimism that we could look through as our lens to dealing with this seemingly troubled public financial system. There seems to be some research behind your statements and it reads with a hopeful tone. Thank you for being a great journalist.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So, Pence wants the federal government to ignore the 2008 law that allows children from these countries to argue for asylum in front of a judge. How did this guy become governor? And how is that we'll soon be subjected to repeatedly seeing him on TV being taken seriously as a presidential candidate? Am I in Bizzaro-U.S.A.?

  2. "And the most rigorous studies of one-year preschool programs have shown short-term benefits that fade out in a few years or no benefits at all." So we are going down a path that seems to have proven not to work very well. Right intention, wrong approach?

  3. Well for Dunkin Donuts it might say that even a highly popular outlet can't make a poorly sited location work. That little strip has seen near constant churn for years.

  4. Years ago, the Pharmaceutical and Medical Device companies shifted their research investment away from Medical Institutions to focus more on private research centers, primarily because of medical institution inefficiencies in initiating clinical studies and their inability/commitment to enroll the needed number of patients in these studies. The protracted timelines of the medical institutions were prompting significant delays in the availability of new drug and medical device entities for patients and relatedly, higher R and D expenditures to the commercial industry because of these delays. While the above stated IU Health "ratio is about $2.50 in federal funding for every $1 in industry funding", the available funding is REVERSED as commercial R and D (primarily Phase I-IV clinical work)runs $2.50 to $1 for available federal funding ($76.8B to $30.9B in 2011). The above article significatly understated the available R and D funding from industry......see the Pharma and Medical Device industry websites. Clearly, if medical institutions like IU Health wish to attract more commercial studies, they will need to become more competitive with private clinical sites in their ability to be more efficient and in their commitment to meet study enrollment goals on time. Lastly, to the reference to the above Washington Post article headlined “As drug industry’s influence over research grows, so does the potential for bias", lacks some credibility as both FDA and Institutional Institutional Review Boards must approve the high proportion of these studies before studies are started. This means that both study safety and science must be approved by both entities.

  5. ChIeF and all the other critics – better is better no matter what. Get over it; they are doing better despite you ?

ADVERTISEMENT