Efroymson back at IMOCA

May 30, 2009
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
I'll take a break from my NYC dispatches so that IBJ reporter Kathleen McLaughlin can offer this report.

Philanthropist Jeremy Efroymson has a rather unorthodox plan for leading the contemporary art venue that he co-founded out of financial straits.

Efroymson will become executive director of the Indianapolis Museum of Contemporary Art, or iMoCA, the organization announced Friday. He will work for free while implementing his strategy of using freelance curators.

“It is a fairly unique scenario,” co-founder Stephen Schaf said. “We’ve always kind of don things differently at iMoCA.”

The freelance curators will replace iMoCA staff curator Christopher West. His last day was Friday.

Schaf admitted that iMoCA is struggling to make ends meet. He said the board of directors discussed folding, but Efroymson, who is not currently on the board, stepped forward. “Some people think it takes somebody throwing half a million dollars at museum,” he said. “It takes so much more than that.”

Efroymson has been a key financial supporter, as well as visionary. For the past three years, he underwrote the salary of former executive director Kathy Nagler, Schaf said.

Nagler departed recently to help the Indianapolis Museum of Art with fund-raising. Schaf said iMoCA didn’t have the money to support her position after July 1. The museum, which has galleries at 340 N. Senate Ave., has one other paid staff person.

The museum tends to receive grants for specific shows, but has not been able to raise enough operating revenue, Schaf said. “No one wants to give us money to pay for equipment. No one wants to give us money to pay for technology. No one wants to give us money to pay for salaries.”

The new strategy is an attempt to capitalize on the grant-making trend. Schaf said curatorial expenses will be built into the budgets for specific exhibitions. He added that West will curate an exhibit running in conjunction with the August Gen Con convention, as well as an architecture show in the spring.

Schaf declined to talk about iMoCA’s finances because he said they’re under review for the upcoming fiscal year. The most recent available financial statement filed with the Internal Revenue Service is from 2006 and shows iMoCA with revenue of about $104,000.

Your thoughts?
  • Dear Readers,

    The above blog posts contains an error about the extent of Jeremy Efroymson's financial support for the executive director position at iMOCA. Katherine Nagler, who recently left the position, informs us that Efroymson made a salary grant for two years, not three.

    We'll update the blog post soon. (I don't have access to the magical blogware.)

    -- Kathleen
  • This is astounding news about IMOCA! This museum, I have found, confuses a GREAT number of people... unfortunately. Looking forward to the future ideas!

    Maybe... if the people who are actually interested in the arts, understood the financial specifics... then there would be more support. I get involved with the arts on a 'low budget', donating time & artwork, networking, and talking up the arts in Indiana.

    Artists and Patrons/Sponsors would be wise to work together!

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.