PAGE NOT FOUND


We're sorry, but we cannot find the page you requested. Our Advanced Search page can assist in helping you find the article or content you are attempting to locate.

Thank You!

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Drone usage for commercial use is an inevitability. If an Indianapolis company has the wherewithal to "push the envelope" and be a trailblazer for something that is most definitely going to happen, I say go ahead. As long as they keep it from going to high and are responsible about battery life, they should have the every right to profit from their footage.

  2. Very interesting story. Looking forward to going on an IU road game or two! :)

  3. John, you're right on that! How a precarious financial situation of their own making can then be risk reduced using another $21M tax revenue reserves to restructure debt without constituents up in arms is just amazing in the worst way. Granted, without that move Carmel would have likely gone into default. That might be the only event that will shake some sense into Carmel voters. Good lord, people. Great stats on education and income, pathetically low on supporting civic fiscal accountability from the executive. You're shareholders, folks. Act like it!

  4. Kenny, sorry it was supposed to be Cherry Tree, auto-correct on phone. It is on the SW corner.

  5. We appreciate the dialogue, but we feel it only right to be informed by more than the "opinion" of a few hobbyist. To compare Fat Atom to a "Drug Dealer" is not only irresponsible, it is libel. Please read the following articles - http://motherboard.vice.com/read/commercial-drones-are-completely-legal-a-federal-judge-ruled http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2014/01/drones-faa-lawsuit-coming-to-american-skies-102754.html#.U9phPYBdW4u

ADVERTISEMENT