IBJNews

Emmis posts quarterly profit on higher radio revenue

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. reported a profit in its latest quarter as revenue from its radio stations increased slightly.

The Indianapolis-based media company said Thursday morning that it earned $4.6 million, or 10 cents per share, in the fiscal third quarter ended Nov. 30 compared with a profit of $110 million, or $1.26 per share, in the same period of the previous year.

Profit in the third quarter of 2011, however, was unusually high due to the sale of three major radio stations and the repurchase of company preferred stock.

Revenue of $53.4 million in the latest quarter was flat compared to the same period in 2011. But revenue from Emmis’ 19 FM and three AM radio stations increased slightly, to $37.2 million.

Revenue from publishing operations dipped 4 percent, to $16.9 million.

In December, Emmis CEO Jeff Smulyan completed his years-long quest to strengthen the company’s balance sheet by pulling off a $100 million debt refinancing.

The new financing—an $80 million term loan and a $20 million credit line—won't come due until December 2017.

Emmis stock rose 11 cents Thursday morning, to $2 per share, down from a 52-week high of $2.57 reached in August.


 

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. I always giggle when I read comments from people complaining that a market is "too saturated" with one thing or another. What does that even mean? If someone is able to open and sustain a new business, whether you think there is room enough for them or not, more power to them. Personally, I love visiting as many of the new local breweries as possible. You do realize that most of these establishments include a dining component and therefore are pretty similar to restaurants, right? When was the last time I heard someone say "You know, I think we have too many locally owned restaurants"? Um, never...

  2. It's good to hear that the festival is continuing to move forward beyond some of the narrow views that seemed to characterize the festival and that I and others had to deal with during our time there.

  3. Corner Bakery announced in March that it had signed agreements to open its first restaurants in Indianapolis by the end of the year. I have not heard anything since but will do some checking.

  4. "The project still is awaiting approval of a waiver filed with the Federal Aviation Administration that would authorize the use of the land for revenue-producing and non-aeronautical purposes." I wonder if the airport will still try to keep from paying taxes on these land tracts, even though they are designated as "non aeronatical?"

  5. How is this frivolous? All they are asking for is medical screenings to test the effects of their exposure. Sounds like the most reasonable lawsuit I've read about in a while. "may not have commited it" which is probably why they're suing to find out the truth. Otherwise they could just ask Walmart, were you negligent? No? OK, thanks for being honest.

ADVERTISEMENT