Emmis 3Q revenue declines, but company still posts profit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Emmis Communications Corp. Chairman Jeff Smulyan continues to see a silver lining in the otherwise dark cloud hanging over his company and the entire radio industry.

Indianapolis-based Emmis, which released its third-quarter earning report Friday morning, saw significant revenue declines both in the three months ended Nov. 30 and in the year-to-date period. Quarterly revenue was $64.6 million, down 18 percent from the same period a year earlier. Revenue for the first nine months of the fiscal year was down 23 percent from a year ago, to  $188.6 million.

Even so, the media company saw a $1.7 million profit this quarter compared to a $125.7 million loss during the same quarter of last year. The loss last year was due primarily to a $210.2 million impairment loss related to the Federal Communications Commission licenses during the third quarter. Emmis owns 22 radio stations in seven U.S. markets along with radio operations in Bulgaria and Slovakia and seven U.S. magazines.

Smulyan told employees in a Friday letter that there’s reason for optimism.

“If there’s a general theme to our results, it’s that things continue to head in the right direction,” Smulyan wrote. “We continue to see sequential improvements in Emmis’ domestic radio results and our advances accelerated during the recent holiday season.”

In the letter, Smulyan touted investments to stations in New York, Los Angeles and Austin, Texas, as well as “strategy initiatives in [Emmis’] Publishing Division focused on accelerating revenue growth during the upcoming recovery.”

“These steps should help us in the future as our business rebounds,” Smulyan added.

Smulyan told employees that ratings at Emmis stations in St. Louis, New York, Los Angeles and Chicago were surging. Stations in Indianapolis and Austin also were strong “across the board,” he wrote. In Indianapolis, Emmis owns WLHK-FM 97.1, WIBC-FM 93.1, WYXB-FM 105.7 and WFNI-AM 1070.

But even the ever-optimistic Smulyan notes Emmis is still in danger as the tumult in the radio industry continues.

“No matter how much things head in the right direction, it’s clear we aren't out of the woods yet,” Smulyan said. “The economy is better, but it's certainly not on solid footing yet. Advertisers are starting to open up their checkbooks, but they’re not ready to return to pre-recession spending levels.”

And there’s a bit more sobering news in Emmis’ earnings filing, which details a “precipitous decline of advertising spending in [Emmis’] domestic and international radio markets.” Emmis’ biggest advertisers, automotive companies, spent 36 percent less with its radio stations during the first nine months of the current fiscal year than it did during the same period a year previous.

For the nine-month period ended November 30, 2009, revenues of Emmis’ domestic radio stations were down 21.4 percent, compared to domestic radio markets overall where Emmis has stations, which were down 18.3 percent, according to Miller Kaplan, a Los Angeles-based media consultancy.

Emmis shares were trading at $1.19 around noon, down 10 cents from Thursday's closing price.


Post a comment to this story

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing