Emptying the A&E notebook

August 6, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Some thoughts on recent arts encounters that didn't make it into my weekly IBJ A&E review column:

--  With a trio of young, out-of-town sports nuts in tow, I recently paid my first visit in years to the National Art Museum of Sport. Don't worry if the museum isn't on your cultural radar: It's housed unobtrusively in corridors and lobbies of the University Place Conference Center at IUPUI. While you won't find blockbuster exhibitions here, the pieces are varied and interesting--and a walk-through is free. Right now, you can see work focused on the Olympics, including posters designed by fine art legends Robert Rauschenberg, Victor Vasarely, and Alex Katz.

-- Last night I caught a sneak preview at the State Museum's IMAX theater of the new 3-D computer animated film "Fly Me to the Moon." It's a remakable technical achievement with some of the most breathtaking visuals I've seen in this format. Unfortunately, it's also a remarkably bad writing achievement, with a script that even made my 6-year-old cringe. Question: Didn't someone realize how lame the drama, inconsistant the action, and unfunny the jokes are? And, given that the lip movements don't match much of the dialogue anyway, couldn't they have given it one more rewrite and redub before sending it out to theaters? A shame, because the IMAX and the show's sponsors are doing some great tie-ins with the space program, offering free weekend tickets and interactive activities in the lobby.

--I was out of town when the Indianapolis Museum of Arts latest ticketed show, "To Live Forever" opened. A walk through last weekend revealed that the small artifacts were as interesting--if not moreso--than the large pieces. Not as thought-provoking or well-put-together as the recent Roman show, it's nonetheless another feather in the cap for the IMA--even if the show would be just as comfortable in an historical museum.

For more reviews and previews, visit www.ibj.com/arts.

Post a comment to this blog

We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing