IBJNews

EnerDel parent shakes up management ranks

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

Battery maker Ener1 Inc., which has almost 400 employees in the Indianapolis area, has fired its chief executive to improve the flagging company’s performance.

Ener1 replaced CEO Charles Gassenheimer this week with Chris Cowger, who was the New York-based company’s president, according to a public filing. Gassenheimer is also required to resign as chairman.

Ivy Tech President Thomas J. Snyder, a board member of Ener1, also was appointed to take the role of non-executive chairman of the board.

Ener1’s stock has plunged 95 percent this year and the company has been struggling to survive. In August, Ener1 said it was “determining whether the company has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations.” It’s also restating its financial results for 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, and has not filed its second-quarter report.

Cowger, a former vice president at computer processor-maker Advanced Micro Devices Inc., will “enhance the company’s ability to execute its business and financial plans in the current economic environment,” Ener1 said in the filing.

"We are fortunate to have hired Chris Cowger earlier this year," said Snyder in a prepared statement. "He's done an excellent job re-focusing Ener1 on the needs of its current and potential customers."

Ener1’s Indiana-based battery-manufacturing subsidiary EnerDel Inc. received an $118.5 million grant from the U.S. Energy Department in 2009 to help the company expand its production capacity. In January, Vice President Joe Biden visited an Ener1 factory in Indianapolis to promote companies building green vehicles.

Company shares were priced at $4.17 when Biden visited the plant on Jan. 26. The shares closed at 15 cents each Wednesday. Ener1 has a market value of $32 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Brian Sinderson, a company spokesman, declined to comment on the management changes or the company’s financial situation in an e-mailed message.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. These higher rates Co. e about only because physicians are now hospital employees. otherwise physicians couldn't charge these rates and share the windfall with the hospital. Community/rural hospitals probably not buying physicians practices and thus weren't getting the windfall anyway.

  2. The incentive for poor people to get themselves off public assistance and "no longer be poor" is even with help...they're STILL POOR! Being poor, even with some assistance, isn't all that pleasant. (I speak from experience) It's a stubborn myth that poor people, who are on public assistance, are sitting in the lap of luxury. You should try living on just those "freebies" that you mentioned and see how meager they actually are. By the way, I didn't mean you had to buy/own a puppy...just pet one. :)

  3. As near as I can tell the minority has ZERO constitutional obligation to offer a quorum to the majority. A requirement for quorum was inserted into the constitution so that tyrannical majorities could not simply shove through odious and objectionable legislation (which is exactly what they did.) By allowing a tyrannical majority to charge fines against the minority for exercising their constitutional prerogative to deny quorum the court as made a mockery of constitutional governance in the state of Indiana.

  4. The voters elected the Reps to make a vote not walk out on the vote. They had to the right to exercise their opinion and vote "no" to the bill. Let me ask you this if you walked out of your job for 5 straight weeks would you get paid? Would you even have a job to go back to? If any elected official walks out on the people they should be arrested for stealing tax dollars from the public. They were elected to do a job and not leave when the job gets stuff.

  5. I have been to several of their locations in Pennsylvania and always go in for 1 item and leave with a basket full of things. I'm very happy they decided on Indiana, now if only they would put the other store in eastside.

ADVERTISEMENT