IBJNews

EnerDel parent shakes up management ranks

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Battery maker Ener1 Inc., which has almost 400 employees in the Indianapolis area, has fired its chief executive to improve the flagging company’s performance.

Ener1 replaced CEO Charles Gassenheimer this week with Chris Cowger, who was the New York-based company’s president, according to a public filing. Gassenheimer is also required to resign as chairman.

Ivy Tech President Thomas J. Snyder, a board member of Ener1, also was appointed to take the role of non-executive chairman of the board.

Ener1’s stock has plunged 95 percent this year and the company has been struggling to survive. In August, Ener1 said it was “determining whether the company has sufficient liquidity to fund its operations.” It’s also restating its financial results for 2010 and the first quarter of 2011, and has not filed its second-quarter report.

Cowger, a former vice president at computer processor-maker Advanced Micro Devices Inc., will “enhance the company’s ability to execute its business and financial plans in the current economic environment,” Ener1 said in the filing.

"We are fortunate to have hired Chris Cowger earlier this year," said Snyder in a prepared statement. "He's done an excellent job re-focusing Ener1 on the needs of its current and potential customers."

Ener1’s Indiana-based battery-manufacturing subsidiary EnerDel Inc. received an $118.5 million grant from the U.S. Energy Department in 2009 to help the company expand its production capacity. In January, Vice President Joe Biden visited an Ener1 factory in Indianapolis to promote companies building green vehicles.

Company shares were priced at $4.17 when Biden visited the plant on Jan. 26. The shares closed at 15 cents each Wednesday. Ener1 has a market value of $32 million, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Brian Sinderson, a company spokesman, declined to comment on the management changes or the company’s financial situation in an e-mailed message.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT