ExactTarget eyed as attractive takeover target

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

ExactTarget Inc., the e-mail marketer that went public in March, is tempting software firms from Oracle Corp. to SAP AG to pursue a takeover of one of the fastest-growing information technology companies in America.

ExactTarget, which counts Microsoft Corp. and Groupon Inc. among its customers, is projected to more than double its revenue in the next two years, a higher rate than 93 percent of U.S.-based information technology software companies valued at more than $1 billion, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The Indianapolis-based company’s stock is up 25 percent since its initial public offering.

With this month’s purchases of an online-shopping analysis firm and a provider of marketing management products, ExactTarget has a more complete package of Web-based marketing tools that may entice software makers to offer at least a 50-percent premium, said shareholder RCM Capital Management LLC.

While ExactTarget is unprofitable, Oracle, SAP and Microsoft lag behind in developing comparable marketing technology and may consider buying the $1.56 billion company, said Barrington Research Associates Inc. and Royal Bank of Canada.

ExactTarget is “the biggest, fastest-growing market share gainer in the space,” said Robert Breza, a Minneapolis-based analyst at RBC. “Marketing is going to get more and more important, especially as the technology evolves.”

A representative for ExactTarget declined to comment on whether the company has been approached by any potential buyers or would be open to a sale.

Founded in 2000, ExactTarget provides software that companies use to customize e-mails and social-media advertisements according to user preferences, which are tracked through clicks. The company had its trading debut in March, after scrapping its previous plan to go public in 2009 amid the financial crisis.

The e-mail marketer’s shares have since climbed more than 25 percent, to $23.74, at Thursday's closing.

While ExactTarget hasn’t reported a profit since 2008 and is forecast to post losses this year and next, the company’s revenue has increased every year since at least 2007, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

ExactTarget is “a very high-quality SaaS company,” said Jeff Houston, a Chicago-based analyst with Barrington Research, referring to providers of software as a service.

The software provider’s revenue is projected to rise 126 percent from last year’s level to $468 million in 2014, according to the average analyst estimate compiled by Bloomberg. Only human-resources software maker Cornerstone OnDemand Inc. and Splunk Inc., which offers software to help businesses analyze Web data, are projected for faster growth rates in the industry, the data show.

The ratio of the ExactTarget’s market value to its revenue in the past 12 months was 6.3 as of yesterday, compared with an average of 5.1 times for similar-sized U.S.-based application software firms that focus on information technology, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

ExactTarget’s e-mail, mobile and social-media marketing technologies are drawing customers at a time when traditional means of reaching consumers through newspaper, television and radio advertisements have become less effective, said Tony Ursillo, a Boston-based technology analyst at Loomis Sayles & Co., which oversees about $180 billion, including ExactTarget shares.

The Internet marketing software industry will generate $17 billion in revenue in 2012, more than print and direct-mail advertising combined, according to estimates from Los Angeles- based industry researcher IBISWorld. The industry expanded at a compound annual growth rate of 11.2 percent from 2007 to 2012, the estimates show.

This month, ExactTarget said it spent more than $115 million acquiring two closely held firms in one day. The company bought iGoDigital, which provides retailers including Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Staples Inc. with software to help customize online experiences based on consumer behavior, and Pardot LLC for its business-to-business marketing automation technology with customers such as Restaurant.com.

Previously, ExactTarget had focused on business-to-consumer technology, Brett Fodero, a New York-based analyst at Lazard Capital Markets LLC, said.

With those acquisitions, ExactTarget “has put together a nice suite of products” that may lure software companies looking to gain an instant foothold in the expanding digital marketing industry, according to Walter Price, a San Francisco-based money manager for RCM Capital Management, which oversaw about $142 billion as of June 30, including ExactTarget shares.

“Rather than assembling a group of five acquisitions, you can get what you want in one” by buying ExactTarget, Price said. “It fits nicely into somebody that’s trying to move into this marketing as a service category.”

ExactTarget’s products and rising revenue may justify a premium of 50 percent to 100 percent, Price said. That would value the company’s equity at a minimum of about $35.54 a share, or about $2.35 billion.

That’s “probably a good place to have the bidding start,” he said.

Microsoft, Oracle and Walldorf, Germany-based SAP are starting to develop digital-marketing offerings and could be interested in buying ExactTarget to accelerate that process, said Houston of Barrington Research.

“It’s the way the industry is moving,” he said. Oracle, Microsoft and SAP are “just now trying to acquire sizeable companies to get them in that space.”

Salesforce.com Inc., the largest provider of online customer management software, also may consider acquiring ExactTarget to add to its product offerings, said RBC’s Breza.

“Microsoft, SAP, Salesforce.com, Oracle are clearly companies who need to help and advance themselves towards a newer solution,” RBC’s Breza said. Those companies have “to get in the 21st century at this point.”

San Francisco-based Salesforce completed the acquisition of Buddy Media Inc., a social-media marketing software firm, in August for about $736 million, according to a regulatory filing. Oracle said it agreed to buy Vitrue Inc., another digital marketing company, in May for an undisclosed amount.

Representatives from SAP; Salesforce; Redmond, Wash.- based Microsoft; and Redwood City, Calif.-based Oracle declined to comment on whether the companies were interested in bidding for ExactTarget.

SAP is “not on any shopping sprees” for acquisitions, Co-CEO Bill McDermott said Wednesday with Linzie Janis on Bloomberg Television’s “Countdown.” SAP, the biggest maker of business-management software, already owns about 2 percent of ExactTarget shares, data compiled by Bloomberg show.

ExactTarget management may not want to sell after the purchases of iGoDigital and Pardot bolstered its potential growth as an independent company, said Lazard’s Fodero.

Also, acquirers in the industry have been more focused on private vendors and adding new technology through smaller deals, he said. ExactTarget may be too big to draw interest, he said.

Still, as digital marketing becomes essential to corporate advertising, ExactTarget may be increasingly attractive to software companies, RCM Capital Management’s Price said.

ExactTarget is a “strategically valuable company,” he said. Traditional “funnels to bring new customers are broken and so they need to find something that works, particularly for customers that are spending a lot more time on electronic media. This is a way to do that.”


  • Not a dog anymore
    John Cole should probably never talk about M&A again, because he clearly doesn't know jack.
  • software company
    This site is the e-mail marketer that went public in March, is tempting software firms from Oracle Corp. to SAP AG to pursue a takeover of one of the fastest-growing information technology companies in America. another related software company is software company.<
  • No, they're not
    ExactTarget is only cool in Indianapolis. They generate zero organic buzz. In fact, if you search for news on them, you'll quickly discover that virtually all that is there is stuff they generate themselves and place, sometimes on free sites, sometimes on pay sites. Nobody is talking about ET outside of central Indiana. Nobody. They would be smart to get what they can for this dog while it still has local buzz. That will go away soon enough. Can you say Slingshot?
  • Really?
    Let's be honest about this company. Since the first week, this stock has been trending down dramatically. It bounced a little this week on takeover talk, but it is a loser and it's not going to get a 50% premium. Tech companies that command premiums have technologies that have potential going forward. There's nothing unique about ET, other than their customer base, and customer bases are very, very fickle. Nice try, IBJ, but this company is a dog, especially in this M&A market. You're going to end up with the worst of all worlds. They'll be acquired at roughly FMV, and then they'll move to the Valley. On the bright side, it will give Mayor Bollard another TIF opportunity to peddle when they leave their newly renovated building next to the future OneAmerica parking garage.
  • Disclosure
    Shouldn't there be a disclosure statement? IBJ is a customer of ExactTarget as well.
  • Exact Target
    It is like in the movie the Social Network. Right now Exact Target is cool and no one knows how high they can fly. Do they really want to sell the company now? Or maybe wait awhile and see how much potential is there. Exact Target is good for the city, I would hate to see them sell a potential "Hundred Billion" dollar company too early.

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. Socialized medicine works great for white people in Scandanavia. It works well in Costa Rica for a population that is partly white and partly mestizo. I don't really see Obamacare as something aimed against whites. I think that is a Republican canard designed to elicit support from white people for republican candidates who don't care about them any more than democrats care about the non-whites they pander to with their phony maneuvers. But what is different between Costa Rica nd the Scandanavian nations on one hand and the US on the other? SIZE. Maybe the US is just too damn big. Maybe it just needs to be divided into smaller self governing pieces like when the old Holy Roman Empire was dismantled. Maybe we are always trying the same set of solutions for different kinds of people as if we were all the same. Oh-- I know-- that is liberal dogma, that we are all the same. Which is the most idiotic American notion going right back to the propaganda of 1776. All men are different and their differences are myriad and that which is different is not equal. The state which pretends men are all the same is going to force men to be the same. That is what America does here, that is what we do in our stupid overseas wars, that is how we destroy true diversity and true difference, and we are all as different groups of folks, feeling the pains of how capitalism is grinding us down into equally insignificant proletarian microconsumers with no other identity whether we like it or not. And the Marxists had this much right about the War of Independence: it was fundamentally a war of capitalist against feudal systems. America has been about big money since day one and whatever gets in the way is crushed. Health care is just another market and Obamacare, to the extent that it Rationalizes and makes more uniform a market which should actually be really different in nature and delivery from place to place-- well that will serve the interests of the biggest capitalist stakeholders in health care which is not Walmart for Gosh Sakes it is the INSURANCE INDUSTRY. CUI BONO Obamacare? The insurance industry. So republicans drop the delusion pro capitalist scales from your eyes this has almost nothing to do with race or "socialism" it has to do mostly with what the INSURANCE INDUSTRY wants to have happen in order to make their lives and profits easier.

    2. Read the article - the reason they can't justify staying is they have too many medicare/medicaid patients and the re-imbursements for transporting these patient is so low.

    3. I would not vote for Bayh if he did run. I also wouldn't vote for Pence. My guess is that Bayh does not have the stomach to oppose persons on the far left or far right. Also, outside of capitalizing on his time as U. S. Senator (and his wife's time as a board member to several companies) I don't know if he is willing to fight for anything. If people who claim to be in the middle walk away from fights with the right and left wing, what are we left with? Extremes. It's probably best for Bayh if he does not have the stomach for the fight but the result is no middle ground.

    4. JK - I meant that the results don't ring true. I also questioned the 10-year-old study because so much in the "health care system" has changed since the study was made. Moreover, it was hard to get to any overall conclusion or observation with the article. But....don't be defensive given my comments; I still think you do the best job of any journalist in the area shedding light and insight on important health care issues.

    5. Probably a good idea he doesn't run. I for one do not want someone who lives in VIRGINIA to be the governor. He gave it some thought, but he likes Virginia too much. What a name I cannot say on this site! The way these people think and operate amuses me.