Executive compensation surges at CNO Financial Group

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

CNO Financial Group Inc. had a good year last year. But its CEO and other top brass had an even better one.

The Carmel-based life and health insurer more than doubled CEO Jim Prieur’s compensation, and also gave increases ranging from 44 percent to 89 percent to other top executives, according to CNO’s proxy statement filed Tuesday with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.

The company, formerly known as Conseco Inc., saw its stock price soar nearly 36 percent last year. And its profits, before factoring in investments, interest and taxes, rose 7 percent.

Prieur pulled in $6.7 million in salary, bonus, stock and perks—up 102 percent from the $3.3 million in compensation he received in 2009.

Chief Financial Officer Ed Bonach saw his pay package surge 89 percent, to $2.9 million.

The leaders of CNO’s two main business units—Bankers Life chief Scott Perry and Washington National boss Steve Stecher—enjoyed pay increases of 44 percent and 46 percent, respectively.

Perry received $2.2 million in pay, stock and perks. Stecher was awarded $1.7 million.

Eric Johnson, who heads up CNO’s investment arm, called 40|86 Advisors, enjoyed a 56-percent boost in compensation, to a total of $2.2 million. CNO’s investments enjoyed a big year in 2010, as the markets continued their recovery.

Whereas the company had realized investment losses of $61 million in 2009, last year, it had realized investment gains of $30 million. Both figures are before accounting for taxes.

In the cases of all five execs, the increases were driven primarily by larger stock awards and larger long-term-incentive compensation, which is a cash bonus based on specific performance measures.

Those measures include earnings per share based on continuing operations of the company, operating earnings before investments, interest and taxes, operating expenses and the value of new business.

Concerning Prieur, the proxy statement says: “Mr. Prieur’s base salary, target incentive, and equity compensation awards for fiscal 2010 were determined in accordance with the compensation philosophy described above, including the policy of targeting our compensation within our ‘competitive market’ as described above. In setting his salary, target incentive and equity compensation, the committee relied on market competitive pay data and the strong belief that the chief executive officer significantly and directly influences our overall performance.”

CNO's stock was down 1.9 percent Tuesday morning, to $7.66 per share.


  • Silent Story
    Just because you don't hear about it does not meant there aren't layoffs. 80% of the QA jobs are being sent to India and they are laying off in small groups at a time to keep the story out of the news.
  • lipstickonapig
    just shows you when the biz is farmed out to 3rdratecountries, we win big.
  • Hey Ryan...
    Read the article. They lost $61 million before they gained $30 million. I'm no financial genius, but a net $29 million loss hardly seems like time to pop the Champagne. Though increasingly it seems like just that if you're in insurance or banking.
  • How much do they need?
    That $3 million extra for ONE man could have easily been used to add $1 or $2k to every employee to help make up for rising fuel prices and make things easier for the grunts who do the real work. But NOoooooo! The top 1% are totally screwing the rest of us because THEY CAN.
  • How much do they need?
    That $3 million extra for ONE man could have easily been used to add $1 or $2k to every employee to help make up for rising fuel prices and make things easier for the grunts who do the real work. But NOoooooo! The top 1% are totally screwing the rest of us because THEY CAN.
  • Thanks
    I ran a chart from Sept 2006 to the present time and compared the performance of CNO to the S&P 500. Why that date? That is when the current CEO arrived at CNO. The results? The S&P 500 was down a few percent and CNO was down greater than 60%. So yes the shareholders should be thanking a management team for collecting millions while the shareholders lost a bundle.
  • Hold up
    So the "Middle Class" employees that are fortunate enough to be able to have the stock option are above all the "Lower Class" employees? How's that fair? Also, what about their changes in their raise and position salary maxes? If they're making so much money then why did they lower raises and make it harder for management to even give an annual raise? Money will always stay at the top there.
  • Justified
    It doesn't matter where a CEO lives, increased profits and massive increases in stock prices should always be rewarded. There hasn't been a story about layoffs, so the middle class is not - actually - paying the price. The middle class employees with stock options, however, were rewarded with big gains in their portfolios last year. So, I'll speak for the executives mentioned and say, "You're welcome."
    • Not At All Shocking
      The Conseco executive ATM machine keeps on giving, and giving, and giving.......Always has and always will. Its in the corporate culture.
    • Justifiable?
      How can this be possible to give the CEO (who doesn't even live in Indiana)a 102% raise? Just goes to show, the rich get richer while the middle class, blue collar worker pays the price!

    Post a comment to this story

    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.