IBJNews

Existing-home sales sink for eighth straight month

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Home-sale agreements dropped nearly 20 percent in the nine-county Indianapolis area in April, the eighth straight month of decreasing deals.

Pending sales of existing homes fell 19.9 percent, from 3,153 in April 2013 to 2,525 in April 2014, real estate agency F.C. Tucker said Tuesday morning.

Area home prices continued to rise as inventories shrank. The average home price through the first four months of 2014 was $165,238, Tucker said, an increase of 8.2 percent compared with the same period of 2013.

Available homes for sale in the region dropped 1.4 percent in April, with 10,924 houses on the market, 160 fewer than the same month a year ago.

Pending sales were down in eight of the area’s nine counties in April.

Hancock County saw a rise of 9.5 percent, from 105 agreements in April 2013 to 115 in April 2014.

Marion County saw a 20-percent drop in sale agreements, from 1,341 last year to 1,073 this year.

Housing hotbed Hamilton County suffered a whopping decrease of 26.1 percent, to 547 agreements.  

Deals fell 21.6 percent in Hendricks County, to 240, and were off 8.3 percent in Johnson County, to 232.

Year-over-year average home prices rose 10 percent in Hamilton County, to $260,670. The lowest average home price was in Madison County, at $73,095.

Four homes priced between $1 million and $2 million sold in central Indiana in April. Nearly half the sales in the area (1,151) took place in the $100,000-to-$199,999 price range.



 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Sales Gangbusters on West Side
    Reports we've heard from Realtors on the west side don't agree. Sales have been been gangbusters with lots of quality inventory available.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT