IBJNews

Express Scripts, WellPoint in contract fight

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Pharmacy benefits manager Express Scripts Inc. said Tuesday it is in the middle of a contract dispute with WellPoint Inc., one of the biggest health insurers in the United States.

Express Scripts said WellPoint has raised the possibility of filing a lawsuit, but it said the companies are negotiating, and Express Scripts believes the companies can resolve the dispute. It said WellPoint is disputing the implementation of some terms of the contract and "certain operational matters associated with Express Scripts' performance" under those terms. The contract between the companies went into effect on Dec. 1, 2009.

WellPoint, based in Indianapolis, operates Blue Cross Blue Shield plans in 14 states and provides health insurance for more than 34 million people, which makes it the nation's largest health insurer based on membership.

St. Louis-based Express Scripts has spent most of this year embroiled in a fight with Walgreen Co., the largest U.S. drugstore chain. A contract between Express Scripts and Walgreen expires at the end of 2011, and the companies have not been able to agree how much Express Scripts should pay Walgreen to fill prescriptions. If they do not agree to a new contract, most people whose prescription drugs plans are managed by Express Scripts won't be able to fill their prescriptions at Walgreen stores.

Express Scripts disclosed the dispute in a form filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Shares of Express Scripts fell 2 percent, to $44.40 each, Tuesday and slipped another 3.6 percent, or $1.60, to $42.80, in after-hours trading. WellPoint stock declined 75 cents, to $64.64, and was unchanged in aftermarket trading.

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Walgreens arrogance
    To Reddog- I can't wait for that to happen! Walgreens has a terrible attitude and overcharge the customer that pays cash. They deserve the backlash/movement to CVS. If they weren't so pompous, many customers moving to the competition may wake them up (one day too late)-
  • RX fight
    Wow...how much can i get from them and how much can I get from them etc etc etc. Walgreen stands to lose a considerable amount of $$. In addition to buying the Rx customers buy other things. Now CVS will cash in and Walgreen management will, in a short time, say "what happened". Too late!

    Post a comment to this story

    COMMENTS POLICY
    We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
     
    You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
     
    Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
     
    No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
     
    We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
     

    Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

    Sponsored by
    ADVERTISEMENT

    facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
    Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
     
    Subscribe to IBJ
    1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

    2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

    3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

    4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

    5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

    ADVERTISEMENT