Making companies say, 'I do'

June 4, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Lots of Indiana towns will do almost anything to get a factory or warehouse. That often means skipping pointed questions about corporate citizenship for fear of losing the project.

A Lebanon city council member isn't looking the other way, though.

Dick Robertson is pressing a New Jersey company to support the community before voting for local incentives the company wants in order to build a $23.5 million refrigerated warehouse in Lebanon Business Park.

Robertson wants verbal assurances from U.S. Cold Storage Inc. that it will back things like Little League and the Fourth of July parade. More companies used to put their names on activities that make communities better places, he says, and they should do it again.

Without mentioning names, Robertson says some companies entering Lebanon in recent years haven’t risen to a high standard of corporate citizenship.

When Cold Storage Vice President Diane Sawyer was grilled on the point at a council meeting this week, she gushed about Lebanon’s quality of life and the company’s green credentials and intent to hire locally. The company also will support city police and fire protection, she said.

But she stopped short of promising more.

Robertson doesn’t want to force Cold Storage or any other company to put its intentions in writing. However, he does want at least a verbal commitment to invest more than the bare minimum in the community.

Lebanon’s council must vote twice to approve an incentive package, and the first vote is expected Monday.

If you were Robertson, how would you vote?

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. The $104K to CRC would go toward debts service on $486M of existing debt they already have from other things outside this project. Keystone buys the bonds for 3.8M from CRC, and CRC in turn pays for the parking and site work, and some time later CRC buys them back (with interest) from the projected annual property tax revenue from the entire TIF district (est. $415K / yr. from just this property, plus more from all the other property in the TIF district), which in theory would be about a 10-year term, give-or-take. CRC is basically betting on the future, that property values will increase, driving up the tax revenue to the limit of the annual increase cap on commercial property (I think that's 3%). It should be noted that Keystone can't print money (unlike the Federal Treasury) so commercial property tax can only come from consumers, in this case the apartment renters and consumers of the goods and services offered by the ground floor retailers, and employees in the form of lower non-mandatory compensation items, such as bonuses, benefits, 401K match, etc.

  2. $3B would hurt Lilly's bottom line if there were no insurance or Indemnity Agreement, but there is no way that large an award will be upheld on appeal. What's surprising is that the trial judge refused to reduce it. She must have thought there was evidence of a flagrant, unconscionable coverup and wanted to send a message.

  3. As a self-employed individual, I always saw outrageous price increases every year in a health insurance plan with preexisting condition costs -- something most employed groups never had to worry about. With spouse, I saw ALL Indiana "free market answer" plans' premiums raise 25%-45% each year.

  4. It's not who you chose to build it's how they build it. Architects and engineers decide how and what to use to build. builders just do the work. Architects & engineers still think the tarp over the escalators out at airport will hold for third time when it snows, ice storms.

  5. http://www.abcactionnews.com/news/duke-energy-customers-angry-about-money-for-nothing

ADVERTISEMENT