IBJNews

FAA says regional airline didn't inspect planes

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

Federal aviation officials on Tuesday proposed fining regional carrier Chautauqua Airlines $348,000 for allegedly flying passengers thousands of times without performing required safety inspections of the planes.

The airline's management of its maintenance program and its system for tracking the status of compliance with safety orders led to the violations, the Federal Aviation Administration said in a statement.

Among the violations cited by the FAA:

— Chautauqua flew eight Canadair Regional Jets more than 9,900 times in 2007 and 2008 before inspecting lower wings for cracks. The inspections were supposed to be performed every 5,000 flights.

— In January 2009, the airline operated a regional jet on 231 flights without inspecting a different section of the lower wings for cracks and flew another of the planes for 61 hours without a required inspection of electrical relays.

— Another regional jet made more than 17,600 flights between November 2007 and January 2009 before mandatory inspections of the plane's GE engines were performed.

— An Embraer 145 regional jet was operated for 43 days past the time one of its inertial navigation units should have been replaced.

"An air carrier's maintenance program can't function without a good system to determine compliance with (safety) directives," FAA Administrator Randy Babbitt said in a prepared statement. Problems following safety directives "are inconsistent with an airline's continued safe operation," he said.

Chautauqua is a subsidiary of Republic Airways Holdings of Indianapolis. Officials for the airline didn't immediately reply to a request for comment.

Chautauqua has 30 days to respond to the agency.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Those of you yelling to deport them all should at least understand that the law allows minors (if not from a bordering country) to argue for asylum. If you don't like the law, you can petition Congress to change it. But you can't blindly scream that they all need to be deported now, unless you want your government to just decide which laws to follow and which to ignore.

  2. 52,000 children in a country with a population of nearly 300 million is decimal dust or a nano-amount of people that can be easily absorbed. In addition, the flow of children from central American countries is decreasing. BL - the country can easily absorb these children while at the same time trying to discourage more children from coming. There is tension between economic concerns and the values of Judeo-Christian believers. But, I cannot see how the economic argument can stand up against the values of the believers, which most people in this country espouse (but perhaps don't practice). The Governor, who is an alleged religious man and a family man, seems to favor the economic argument; I do not see how his position is tenable under the circumstances. Yes, this is a complicated situation made worse by politics but....these are helpless children without parents and many want to simply "ship" them back to who knows where. Where are our Hoosier hearts? I thought the term Hoosier was synonymous with hospitable.

  3. Illegal aliens. Not undocumented workers (too young anyway). I note that this article never uses the word illegal and calls them immigrants. Being married to a naturalized citizen, these people are criminals and need to be deported as soon as humanly possible. The border needs to be closed NOW.

  4. Send them back NOW.

  5. deport now

ADVERTISEMENT