IBJNews

Family of woman killed by falling bottled-water pallets files suit

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share

The estate of a woman who died after pallets of bottled water fell on her at a Kroger store in Franklin is suing the bottler, suggesting a new eco-friendly bottle design may have contributed to the accident.

Lori Keen, 32, died March 20, five days after two pallets of Ice Mountain water weighing a total of about 4,100 pounds fell on her. Keen, a 13-year Kroger employee, had been working in the store's receiving dock and had stacked two pallets, each containing 72 cases of 24 half-liter bottles, on a forklift.

Keen's estate, led by her widower Billie, filed suit against Nestle Waters North America Inc., based in Indianapolis, on Aug. 5 in Marion Superior Court. The case moved to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Indiana on Aug. 25, at Nestle's request, after the plaintiffs acknowledged they are seeking more than $75,000.

The suit alleges Nestle failed to instruct its customers on the danger of stacking pallets and the increased "collapse/toppling risks" associated with its introduction of Eco-Shape bottles, which Nestle bills as the lightest on the market.

"As a direct and proximate result of defendant Nestle's negligent acts and omissions, Lori suffered fatal injuries, her estate incurred medical bills, funeral and burial expenses and is entitled to damages," according to the suit, brought by locally based Cohen & Malad LLP. "Lori's husband, Billie, and their daughter have suffered the loss of support, services, society, love, affection and acts of kindness of Lori."

Nestle, represented by locally based Frost Brown Todd LLC, has not yet filed a response to the lawsuit. Company officials did not immediately respond to inquiries.

State regulators in April slapped Kroger Co. with a $17,000 fine relating to workplace safety violations tied to the accident.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. How can any company that has the cash and other assets be allowed to simply foreclose and not pay the debt? Simon, pay the debt and sell the property yourself. Don't just stiff the bank with the loan and require them to find a buyer.

  2. If you only knew....

  3. The proposal is structured in such a way that a private company (who has competitors in the marketplace) has struck a deal to get "financing" through utility ratepayers via IPL. Competitors to BlueIndy are at disadvantage now. The story isn't "how green can we be" but how creative "financing" through captive ratepayers benefits a company whose proposal should sink or float in the competitive marketplace without customer funding. If it was a great idea there would be financing available. IBJ needs to be doing a story on the utility ratemaking piece of this (which is pretty complicated) but instead it suggests that folks are whining about paying for being green.

  4. The facts contained in your post make your position so much more credible than those based on sheer emotion. Thanks for enlightening us.

  5. Please consider a couple of economic realities: First, retail is more consolidated now than it was when malls like this were built. There used to be many department stores. Now, in essence, there is one--Macy's. Right off, you've eliminated the need for multiple anchor stores in malls. And in-line retailers have consolidated or folded or have stopped building new stores because so much of their business is now online. The Limited, for example, Next, malls are closing all over the country, even some of the former gems are now derelict.Times change. And finally, as the income level of any particular area declines, so do the retail offerings. Sad, but true.

ADVERTISEMENT