IBJNews

FDA: Cook Medical’s stent met efficacy, safety goals

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

A drug-coated stent from Bloomington-based Cook Medical met safety and effectiveness goals in the treatment of blocked femoral arteries, according to a staff report by U.S. regulators weighing whether to clear the device for sale.

Peripheral vascular devices, including stents, angioplasty balloons and synthetic grafts, generated $4.3 billion in global revenue last year and may earn $5.6 billion in 2014, according to Technavio, a market research firm in Elmhurst, Ill.

 An estimated 8 million to 12 million people in the U.S. are affected by peripheral arterial disease affects, according to the Peripheral Arterial Disease Coalition in Lakewood, Colo. The disease can cause leg pain and raise heart-attack and stroke risks.

Bypass surgery and angioplasty, in which a tiny balloon is inserted into the artery to clear the blockage, are among the standard treatments for the disease.

Clinical trials showed closely held Cook’s stent, the Zilver PTX, worked as well as or better than angioplasty and non-medicated stents in unclogging vessels, Food and Drug Administration staff said in a preliminary review released Tuesday on the agency’s website. Outside advisers to the FDA will meet Oct. 13 to evaluate the findings.

Cook's device would be the first drug-coated stent approved in the U.S. to treat peripheral vascular disease in the largest artery of the upper leg. The stent could reduce leg amputations and painful bypass surgeries, the company said after winning approval for the device in Europe two years ago.

In a study of 479 patients, “there were no signals regarding elevated rates of death, stent thrombosis, or stent fracture” in patients treated with Cook’s device,” FDA staff said in the report. “Limited conclusions can be drawn” from that sample size “regarding the detection of rare adverse events.”

If the device is approved, the company should be required to conduct follow-up studies to further assess the risk of side effects or complications, agency reviewers said in the report.

Abbott Laboratories of Illinois and C.R. Bard Inc. of New Jersey are among the manufacturers of devices that treat arterial blockages in the leg.

C.R. Bard won FDA approval in 2009 for a non-drug-coated stent to treat femoral artery disease. That device, known as LifeStent, is a flexible mesh tube that expands inside a clogged vessel and holds it open to restore blood flow.

The Zilver PTX device from Cook also props open the femoral artery and delivers the drug paclitaxel to reduce the risk that fatty deposits will form new blockages.

Cook’s drug-coated stent, if approved, “can be a serious competitor to other companies in this space,” Bruce Jackson, an analyst with Morgan Joseph TriArtisan Group in New York, said Tuesday in an e-mail.

Restenosis, or a recurrence of arterial blockages, occurred in 24 percent of patients treated with Cook’s drug-coated stent after 12 months, and 34 percent of patients treated with angioplasty, according to the FDA report.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. So the Mayor adds another non value added layer to having a vehicle towed? Whereby the City Government RECIEVES AN ILLEGAL KICKBACK FROM A LGOISTICS COMPANY THAT SUBS THE WORK TO LOCAL TOW COMPANIES? What is the service the City performs for receiving the "tribute"? This is RICO!!!!! What a corrupt and unnecessary layer. What a dirtbag Mayor and his cronies.

  2. Owner occupied housing. Clear enough?

  3. So people think I am paranoid. It's from experience in dealing with puds requested by developers who make major donations themselves to representatives, have nice fund raisers for those running for office and hide through pac's. then there are the public relation firms. You will note some pr comments below. You there Clyde Lee? My opinion. Commercial along 421, great. Multifamily housing, terrible idea that will change the town. Senior condos or zero lot line homes west, great. I suggest keeping all entries to commercial areas at 421. All entries to owner occupied on sycamore. Will keep the traffic on sycamore down some. Two other things. You can't trust what will be there in 10 years. Steve builds quality stuff, but areas change over time. Look at the changes at the wall mart center at 86th and 421 over the last 10 years. Look at the apartments and neighborhoods behind St Vincent's. Raintree properties WILL decrease in value if commercial and multifamily goes in near. It has already been happening around the bridges area. The houses that have been sold recently are way below market. Several deals not closed due to the Illinois construction and the whole unsurety of the bridges. It's pretty simple, Zionsville will approve the whole thing because the city council has been groomed over a LONG period of time for this. I might even suggest some are in their position as a result of this.

  4. Esta, do you have a dog in this fight? You seem to really want to knock anyone against this project. No, I didn't move to Indiana for the architecture. I moved here for that red barn in the field. The horses and fields of corn. A place that is NOT overdeveloped. There are plenty of nearby places in Indianapolis that could be REDEVELOPED instead.

  5. RKW - OK, we get it, you're paranoid. The question is, are you paranoid enough? Greg - Yes, Pittman(s) is (are) at it again. They are developers, they build things. It's what they do. So when you go to work tomorrow, Greg, you're at it again too. Cliff - Really? You moved to Indiana for its progressive architecture? That's like moving to England for the cuisine. Zionsvillain - The house you moved to was once a field or woods. I'm willing to bet folks were upset when that ground was plowed under and a house was built. But I guess now that you are in, everything should stop? "My house was OK, but the next one is sprawl." SE Guy - Please don't paint us with such a wide brush. Most reasonable Zionsville residents welcome planned, measured development.

ADVERTISEMENT