IBJNews

Feds take over $20M Irwin pension shortfall

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint

The federal Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. will cover nearly all of a $20.5 million shortfall in the pension plan covering more than 1,000 former workers and retirees of Irwin Financial Corp., the failed Columbus, Ind., banking company.

Irwin is the parent of Irwin Union Bank, the only Indiana bank to be seized by government regulators since the financial crisis began in 2008. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. in September shut down Irwin and sold most of its operations to Cincinnati-based First Financial Corp.

The PBGC estimates that Irwin’s pension plan is 56 percent funded, with assets of $26.7 million to cover $47.2 million in benefit liabilities. The agency expects to be responsible for $19.1 million of the $20.5 million shortfall.

Banking experts say Irwin was unable to recover from massive losses spurred by a nationwide expansion of its home equity loan business over the past decade. Irwin Union Bank was founded in 1871 and was one of the state’s oldest financial institutions.

Its parent, Irwin Financial, is being liquididated in Indianapolis bankruptcy court.

 

ADVERTISEMENT

  • Clawback
    Perhaps, the government should consider claw backs of officer pay or attach their personal assets to cover this shortfall.

    Management should have fully funded this liability instead before paying themselves.

    Business operators would never fail to pay their water and electric bills but defer funding retirement liabilities at will. It should be a criminal offense to allow pension liability to accrue without adequate funding.

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. these guys only skill was to steal from other's hard earned savings.

  2. I voted for him last time and it WAS the LAST time. He needed to to quit running around the world on useless trips, and giving our $$ away to sports teams. I'll vote for anyone but Ballard next time. BTW...we gave $40M to the Pacers and cannot even watch the games on TV.

  3. For the people concerned about traffic, you should know that mixed-use projects (like the one being proposed), actually allows for and encourages more people to walk and bike, thereby mitigating additional automobile traffic. If we continue to design and build suburban-type projects in the City (i.e. automobile-oriented projects), we are not offering anything different from what the suburbs offer, which means we will continue to lose jobs/people to the suburbs. The reason Broad Ripple is somewhat successful today is that people want to live in a place that offers the convenience of being able to walk/bike to restaurants, retail, nightlife, the Monon, etc. Why would you not want to support a project that is complimentary to what already makes the area desirable? The real argument with this project should be its lack-luster design and layout, not the density.

  4. It is unfortunate that there is a perception that celebrities validate an event. The Indy 500 stands on its own, especially for those coming in from out of town. It was always so disturbing to read the gushing descriptions of Ashley Judd threaded throughout the local coverage. Very happy that era is at an end.

  5. Good ole' Obamacare. Thanks liberals and those who didn't bother to vote.

ADVERTISEMENT