Fife to lobby Crean for IU match-up

April 8, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
FifeIndiana-Purdue Fort Wayne officials have been trying to schedule a game with Indiana University for the last three years. Putting IU on the schedule would be an important recruiting tool, bring immediate marketing muscle to the program and be a big money maker for the Mastodons.

The dream would be to get the Hoosiers to visit Fort Wayne at least once every three years, with IPFW traveling to Bloomington the other two years. IUPUI has also sought some kind of home game with IU, to no avail. IUPUI is set to visit Bloomington next season. But IPFW, which jumped to NCAA Div. I in 2001, has one thing IUPUI does not—a home arena with a capacity of about 11,000. And Fort Wayne is a strong Hoosier hoops market where IU wouldn’t mind gaining some exposure.

Despite IPFW Coach Dane Fife’s connections with his alma matter in Bloomington, he had little luck influencing former coach Kelvin Sampson or athletic director Rick Greenspan to give the idea even a whiff.

Now Fife has a new ally at IU in coach Tom Crean. “I would hope that coach Crean would be willing to negotiate,” Fife told the Fort Wayne Journal-Gazette.

As the associate head coach at Michigan State, Crean heavily recruited Fife, who was Michigan’s Mr. Basketball in 1998. Fife and Crean have remained close over the years, and IPFW was successful in scheduling a game with Marquette—where Crean formerly coached—last year.

Crean, himself a Michigan native, is just now filling out his assistant coaching staff and dealing with current player turmoil. Recruiting is next up for Crean, so scheduling won’t likely be considered for a few weeks. And with IU’s schedule already set for next year, Fife and IPFW will have to wait until at least 2009-10. But this time, unlike with Sampson, Fife expects he’ll get an audience with the Hoosiers coach.
ADVERTISEMENT
  • I hope that Crean will be open to helping Dane and schedule an IU and IPFW matchup.
  • I think a lot of IU fans would welcome this math-up. It would be a lot better than watching the Hoosiers play Chatanooga or Tennessee State, both of which were on the schedule last year. It is beyond me why IU doesn't want to help some of the school in its own family. It seems to make good financial sense for all concerned--including fans and taxpayers that support the in-state programs.
  • Sure, why not? IU should play most Indiana schools every single year, if not rotate them every year. IU, Purdue, Butler, and Notre Dame should play each other annually. In addition, the Majors should play Ball State, Indiana State, IUPUI, IPFW, Valpo, etc... from time to time. If the early games include 8 or so small programs, why not add in a couple in-state programs. Makes sense to me and for the tradition.

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. How much you wanna bet, that 70% of the jobs created there (after construction) are minimum wage? And Harvey is correct, the vast majority of residents in this project will drive to their jobs, and to think otherwise, is like Harvey says, a pipe dream. Someone working at a restaurant or retail store will not be able to afford living there. What ever happened to people who wanted to build buildings, paying for it themselves? Not a fan of these tax deals.

  2. Uh, no GeorgeP. The project is supposed to bring on 1,000 jobs and those people along with the people that will be living in the new residential will be driving to their jobs. The walkable stuff is a pipe dream. Besides, walkable is defined as having all daily necessities within 1/2 mile. That's not the case here. Never will be.

  3. Brad is on to something there. The merger of the Formula E and IndyCar Series would give IndyCar access to International markets and Formula E access the Indianapolis 500, not to mention some other events in the USA. Maybe after 2016 but before the new Dallara is rolled out for 2018. This give IndyCar two more seasons to run the DW12 and Formula E to get charged up, pun intended. Then shock the racing world, pun intended, but making the 101st Indianapolis 500 a stellar, groundbreaking event: The first all-electric Indy 500, and use that platform to promote the future of the sport.

  4. No, HarveyF, the exact opposite. Greater density and closeness to retail and everyday necessities reduces traffic. When one has to drive miles for necessities, all those cars are on the roads for many miles. When reasonable density is built, low rise in this case, in the middle of a thriving retail area, one has to drive far less, actually reducing the number of cars on the road.

  5. The Indy Star announced today the appointment of a new Beverage Reporter! So instead of insightful reports on Indy pro sports and Indiana college teams, you now get to read stories about the 432nd new brewery open or some obscure Hoosier winery winning a county fair blue ribbon. Yep, that's the coverage we Star readers crave. Not.

ADVERTISEMENT