IBJNews

First Merchants posts larger loss on fraud charge

Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrint
Muncie-based First Merchants Corp. disclosed this week that the bank lost $31.2 million in the second quarter, including $10.2 million it blamed on fraudulent financial statements provided by a large commercial borrower.

First Merchants did not disclose the name of the borrower but said it is pursuing legal action to recover the loss.

The Muncie Star Press reported the loss may have been related to the bank's business relationship with the Eye Center Group, a Muncie-based eye care and surgery practice. In a recent lawsuit to collect unpaid fees, Eye Center Group ophthalmologist Jeffrey Rapkin alleged that the corporation was $21 million in debt.

The quarterly loss of $31.2 million amounted to $1.48 per share compared to a profit of $6.6 million, or 36 cents per share, in the same period a year earlier.

First Merchants' loan charge-offs for the quarter totaled $40.4 million. Commercial real estate and commercial and industrial loans accounted for much of the charge-offs.

"The single largest charge-off, totaling $10.2 million, was taken as a result of fraudulent financial statements provided by a large commercial and industrial borrower," the bank said in a prepared statement.

First Merchants said it boosted provision for loan losses to $59 million, or 2.2 percent of total loans, from 1 percent in the same quarter last year.

Total assets in the second quarter rose 19 percent over the year-ago period, to $4.7 billion. Deposits grew 20 percent, to $3.6 billion, in the same period.

Much of the growth can be attributed to First Merchant's acquisition of Plainfield-based Lincoln Bancorp., which closed late last year. The purchase expanded First Merchant's share of the Indianapolis market.

Lincoln Bancorp, the parent of Lincoln Bank, had Hendricks County locations in Avon, Brownsburg and Plainfield. In Johnson County, Lincoln branches were in Bargersville, Franklin, Greenwood and Trafalgar.
ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this story

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT

facebook - twitter on Facebook & Twitter

Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ on Facebook:
Follow on TwitterFollow IBJ's Tweets on these topics:
 
Subscribe to IBJ
  1. Irvington is up and coming much like Fountain Square. We would love to have something like this in our neighborhood!

  2. Why do we care who has submitted proposals if we can't review the proposals? It's publicly owned land, but the public has zero say in what gets chosen to be built there. Yep, that sounds about right.

  3. Perhaps May 21 is "Evangelical Day" over at the IBJ?

  4. I don't know what's more depressing: that this passes for a defensible elective in a publicly funded SCIENCE class, or that more than half of the posters here are defending this charlatan. Intelligent design is creationism. Creationism is religion. Yes, we have freedom of religion, which deserves to be protected. Now someone kindly show Professor Hedin his freedom by escorting him over to the Religion department at BSU. Carry on.

  5. I hope people realize that the 'vocal' opposition at the meeting represent the minority of people against this project. As with any controversial project - those who don't want it are the loudest, while those who like it or really don't care one way or the other don't come to such meetings. Unfortunately the same may be true of the survey now being offered by the BRVA. I live less than a 5 minute walk from BR Avenue and can tell you that I and most of my neighbors are support this exciting project, or are ambivalent. And how great that it includes quality apartments - something that BR sorely lacks. This is a first class opportunity that we should embrace (and no, I'm not with the BRVA or the developer.) As for the fellow who owns the Good Earth store, if he doesn't want competition then let him pull together his own investors and out bid Whole Foods to operate the proposed grocery component! Come on folks - let's move ahead.

ADVERTISEMENT