Flashback: Our liveliest arts blogs

July 11, 2008
Back to TopCommentsE-mailPrintBookmark and Share
Somewhere between the 100th and 200th episode of any self-respecting sitcom, there's usually a moment where the cast is trapped
in a walk-in freezer , accidentally locked in a basement or otherwise stuck with each other. At that time, they get nostalgic
about past moments, the screen gets wavy, and we flash back to clips from old episodes.

Well, with over 225 blog posts logged here, I thought it a good time -- no, not to get trapped in a meat locker -- to revisit
some of our liveliest discussions.

For those who arrived late, this is a good chance to add your voices (I'm constantly surprised at how many views even months-old
postings get).

For those who follow the blog regularly, it's a chance to see how some discussins continued.

Also, consider this a thank you to those who have taken the time to post responses, supply clarifying information, and help
spark discussion. The fact is, the readers and posters have been the crucial element in making this blog as successful
as it has been. And I believe the activity here--from arts professionals and laypeople alike--has helped show that Indy does
have a passionate, interested, diverse arts audience. If you haven't posted in the past, consider this a personal invitation.

Okay, the screen is getting wavy...we're flashing back.

Should a city’s smoking ban apply to artistic efforts?
Widely different opinions came out in our discussion of Chicago’s “Jersey Boys’ going smoke-free. Click here.

You reacted strongly to Keystone Art Cinema shifting (at least, temporarily) to mainstream Hollywood fare. Click here.

Explicit content at the supermarket check out? It bothered some of you. Others said to lighten up. Click here.

A New York Times story on summer culture across the country didn’t mention anything in Indiana. Your thoughts were fascinating.
Click here.

When I raised the subject of on-stage flops, the discussion took a more philosophical turn than I anticipated. Click here.

Sex and violins? You responded to the selling of classical musicians based on sex appeal. Click here.

The pros and cons of PBS support were brought out when I raised a question a few months back. Click here.

The release of Tom Cruise’s biography led to a smart discussion of whether or not an artist’s personal life does or should
influence our appreciation of his or her work. Click here.

And, closer to home, the election of Greg Ballard got us talking about what to expect from the Mayor. Click here.

Feel free to continue the discussion on any of these points. Or suggest issues to raise here in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Post a comment to this blog

COMMENTS POLICY
We reserve the right to remove any post that we feel is obscene, profane, vulgar, racist, sexually explicit, abusive, or hateful.
 
You are legally responsible for what you post and your anonymity is not guaranteed.
 
Posts that insult, defame, threaten, harass or abuse other readers or people mentioned in IBJ editorial content are also subject to removal. Please respect the privacy of individuals and refrain from posting personal information.
 
No solicitations, spamming or advertisements are allowed. Readers may post links to other informational websites that are relevant to the topic at hand, but please do not link to objectionable material.
 
We may remove messages that are unrelated to the topic, encourage illegal activity, use all capital letters or are unreadable.
 

Messages that are flagged by readers as objectionable will be reviewed and may or may not be removed. Please do not flag a post simply because you disagree with it.

Sponsored by
ADVERTISEMENT
  1. By Mr. Lee's own admission, he basically ran pro-bono ads on the billboard. Paying advertisers didn't want ads on a controversial, ugly billboard that turned off customers. At least one of Mr. Lee's free advertisers dropped out early because they found that Mr. Lee's advertising was having negative impact. So Mr. Lee is disingenous to say the city now owes him for lost revenue. Mr. Lee quickly realized his monstrosity had a dim future and is trying to get the city to bail him out. And that's why the billboard came down so quickly.

  2. Merchants Square is back. The small strip center to the south of 116th is 100% leased, McAlister’s is doing well in the outlot building. The former O’Charleys is leased but is going through permitting with the State and the town of Carmel. Mac Grill is closing all of their Indy locations (not just Merchants) and this will allow for a new restaurant concept to backfill both of their locations. As for the north side of 116th a new dinner movie theater and brewery is under construction to fill most of the vacancy left by Hobby Lobby and Old Navy.

  3. Yes it does have an ethics commission which enforce the law which prohibits 12 specific items. google it

  4. Thanks for reading and replying. If you want to see the differentiation for research, speaking and consulting, check out the spreadsheet I linked to at the bottom of the post; it is broken out exactly that way. I can only include so much detail in a blog post before it becomes something other than a blog post.

  5. 1. There is no allegation of corruption, Marty, to imply otherwise if false. 2. Is the "State Rule" a law? I suspect not. 3. Is Mr. Woodruff obligated via an employment agreement (contractual obligation) to not work with the engineering firm? 4. In many states a right to earn a living will trump non-competes and other contractual obligations, does Mr. Woodruff's personal right to earn a living trump any contractual obligations that might or might not be out there. 5. Lawyers in state government routinely go work for law firms they were formally working with in their regulatory actions. You can see a steady stream to firms like B&D from state government. It would be interesting for IBJ to do a review of current lawyers and find out how their past decisions affected the law firms clients. Since there is a buffer between regulated company and the regulator working for a law firm technically is not in violation of ethics but you have to wonder if decisions were made in favor of certain firms and quid pro quo jobs resulted. Start with the DOI in this review. Very interesting.

ADVERTISEMENT